Literature DB >> 18308435

The effects of age and step length on joint kinematics and kinetics of large out-and-back steps.

Brian W Schulz1, James A Ashton-Miller, Neil B Alexander.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Maximum step length (MSL) is a clinical test that has been shown to correlate with age, various measures of fall risk, and knee and hip joint extension speed, strength, and power capacities, but little is known about the kinematics and kinetics of the large out-and-back step utilized.
METHODS: Body motions and ground reaction forces were recorded for 11 unimpaired younger and 10 older women while attaining maximum step length. Joint kinematics and kinetics were calculated using inverse dynamics. The effects of age group and step length on the biomechanics of these large out-and-back steps were determined.
FINDINGS: Maximum step length was 40% greater in the younger than in the older women (P<0.0001). Peak knee and hip, but not ankle, angle, velocity, moment, and power were generally greater for younger women and longer steps. After controlling for age group, step length generally explained significant additional variance in hip and torso kinematics and kinetics (incremental R2=0.09-0.37). The young reached their peak knee extension moment immediately after landing of the step out, while the old reached their peak knee extension moment just before the return step liftoff (P=0.03).
INTERPRETATION: Maximum step length is strongly associated with hip kinematics and kinetics. Delays in peak knee extension moment that appear to be unrelated to step length, may indicate a reduced ability of older women to rapidly apply force to the ground with the stepping leg and thus arrest the momentum of a fall.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18308435      PMCID: PMC2528245          DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  34 in total

1.  Changes in isokinetic torque and muscular activity of elbow flexors muscles with age.

Authors:  M Pousson; R Lepers; J Van Hoecke
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.032

2.  Mechanisms leading to a fall from an induced trip in healthy older adults.

Authors:  M J Pavol; T M Owings; K T Foley; M D Grabiner
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.053

3.  Explosive power and asymmetry in leg muscle function in frequent fallers and non-fallers aged over 65.

Authors:  Dawn A Skelton; Jonathon Kennedy; Olga M Rutherford
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 10.668

4.  Age and gender differences in peak lower extremity joint torques and ranges of motion used during single-step balance recovery from a forward fall.

Authors:  L A Wojcik; D G Thelen; A B Schultz; J A Ashton-Miller; N B Alexander
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Choice stepping reaction time: a composite measure of falls risk in older people.

Authors:  S R Lord; R C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.053

6.  Propulsive adaptation to changing gait speed.

Authors:  P O Riley; U Della Croce; D C Kerrigan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Effects of age, step direction, and reaction condition on the ability to step quickly.

Authors:  Carl W Luchies; Jeff Schiffman; Lorie G Richards; Matthew R Thompson; Doug Bazuin; Alice J DeYoung
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 6.053

8.  A clinical measure of maximal and rapid stepping in older women.

Authors:  J L Medell; N B Alexander
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.053

9.  Age-related differences in peak joint torques during the support phase of single-step recovery from a forward fall.

Authors:  Michael L Madigan; Emily M Lloyd
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 6.053

10.  Comparison between young and older women in explosive power output and its determinants during a single leg-press action after optimisation of load.

Authors:  Andrea Macaluso; Giuseppe De Vito
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-07-19       Impact factor: 3.078

View more
  6 in total

1.  Can hip and knee kinematics be improved by eliminating thigh markers?

Authors:  Brian W Schulz; Wendy L Kimmel
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Effects of step length, age, and fall history on hip and knee kinetics and knee co-contraction during the maximum step length test.

Authors:  Brian W Schulz; Manutchanok Jongprasithporn; Stephanie J Hart-Hughes; Tatjana Bulat
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Dynamic-position-sense impairment's independence of perceived knee function in women with ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Andrew E Littmann; Masaki Iguchi; Sangeetha Madhavan; Jamie L Kolarik; Richard K Shields
Journal:  J Sport Rehabil       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 1.931

4.  Altered gait characteristics in individuals with knee osteoarthritis and self-reported knee instability.

Authors:  Shawn Farrokhi; Megan O'Connell; Alexandra B Gil; Patrick J Sparto; G Kelley Fitzgerald
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 4.751

5.  Two different fatigue protocols and lower extremity motion patterns during a stop-jump task.

Authors:  David Quammen; Nelson Cortes; Bonnie L Van Lunen; Shawn Lucci; Stacie I Ringleb; James Onate
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Evaluation of Optimal Control Approaches for Predicting Active Knee-Ankle-Foot-Orthosis Motion for Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Míriam Febrer-Nafría; Benjamin J Fregly; Josep M Font-Llagunes
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 2.650

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.