Literature DB >> 18308108

Outcomes of patients with clinical T1 grade 3 urothelial cell bladder carcinoma treated with radical cystectomy.

Amit Gupta1, Yair Lotan, Patrick J Bastian, Ganesh S Palapattu, Pierre I Karakiewicz, Ganesh V Raj, Mark P Schoenberg, Seth P Lerner, Arthur I Sagalowsky, Shahrokh F Shariat.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Urothelial tumors that invade the lamina propria but not the muscularis propria are a particularly problematic clinical entity. The aim of the present study was to assess the pathologic features and clinical outcomes of patients with clinical T1 grade 3 urothelial cell bladder carcinoma (UCBC) treated with radical cystectomy.
METHODS: We reviewed the records of 958 consecutive patients who underwent radical cystectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for bladder cancer at three U.S. academic centers. Of these patients, 167 (median age, 66.7 years) underwent radical cystectomy for clinical stage T1 grade 3 UCBC.
RESULTS: The median follow-up was 33.8 months (mean +/- standard deviation: 45.9 +/- 39.2 months, range, 0.4 to 177.1) for patients alive at last follow-up. Disease recurred in 48 of 167 of patients (29.4%) and 30 of 162 patients (18.5%) died from bladder cancer. A total of 29 of 166 patients (17.5%) had lymph nodal metastases. Of 167 patients, 84 (50%) were pathologically upstaged and 167 (27.5%) had extravesical disease. Patients with disease upstaging had poorer survival (P <0.001). A greater than 3-month delay between cystectomy and last transurethral resection showed a trend toward upstaging (P = 0.06). Presence of carcinoma in situ (CIS) was the only precystecomy factor that predicted disease recurrence (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.13, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.14 to 3.98) and mortality (HR: 2.75, 95% CI: 1.17 to 6.46).
CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion of patients undergoing cystectomy for clinical T1 grade 3 disease have adverse pathological features. The recurrence and survival outcomes in this group are suboptimal. Presence of CIS precystectomy predicts outcomes. Better markers are needed to identify patients at high risk for adverse outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18308108     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.10.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  13 in total

1.  Prognostic Effect of Carcinoma In Situ in Muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Derek E Thomas; Hristos Z Kaimakliotis; Kevin R Rice; Jose A Pereira; Paul Johnston; Marietta L Moore; Angela Reed; Dylan M Cregar; Cindy Franklin; Rhoda L Loman; Michael O Koch; Richard Bihrle; Richard S Foster; Timothy A Masterson; Thomas A Gardner; Chandru P Sundaram; Charles R Powell; Stephen D W Beck; David J Grignon; Liang Cheng; Costantine Albany; Noah M Hahn
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 2.872

2.  The optimal management of T1 high-grade bladder cancer.

Authors:  Kenneth G Nepple; Michael A O'Donnell
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Radical cystectomy for the treatment of T1 bladder cancer: the Canadian Bladder Cancer Network experience.

Authors:  Venu Chalasani; Wassim Kassouf; Joseph L Chin; Yves Fradet; Armen G Aprikian; Adrian S Fairey; Eric Estey; Louis Lacombe; Ricardo Rendon; David Bell; Ilias Cagiannos; Darrell Drachenberg; Jean-Baptiste Lattouf; Jonathan I Izawa
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Predictors of oncological outcomes in T1G3 patients treated with BCG who undergo radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Francesco Soria; Francesca Pisano; Paolo Gontero; J Palou; S Joniau; V Serretta; S Larré; S Di Stasi; B van Rhijn; J A Witjes; A Grotenhuis; R Colombo; A Briganti; M Babjuk; V Soukup; P U Malmstrom; J Irani; N Malats; J Baniel; R Mano; T Cai; E Cha; P Ardelt; J Varkarakis; R Bartoletti; G Dalbagni; S F Shariat; E Xylinas; R J Karnes; R Sylvester
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Concomitant carcinoma in situ may not be a prognostic factor for patients with bladder cancer following radical cystectomy: a PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lijin Zhang; Bin Wu; Zhenlei Zha; Hu Zhao; Jun Yuan; Yuefang Jiang
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  Survival Outcomes of Early versus Deferred Cystectomy for High-Grade Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jonathan C M Wan
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2020-06-23

7.  Impact of concomitant carcinoma in situ on upstaging and outcome following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Faysal A Yafi; Armen G Aprikian; Joseph L Chin; Yves Fradet; Jonathan Izawa; Eric Estey; Adrian Fairey; Ricardo Rendon; Ilias Cagiannos; Louis Lacombe; Jean-Baptiste Lattouf; Fred Saad; David Bell; Darrel Drachenberg; Wassim Kassouf
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-11-10       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Comparative Outcomes of Primary Versus Recurrent High-risk Non-muscle-invasive and Primary Versus Secondary Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer After Radical Cystectomy: Results from a Retrospective Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Nico C Grossmann; Pawel Rajwa; Fahad Quhal; Frederik König; Hadi Mostafaei; Ekaterina Laukhtina; Keiichiro Mori; Satoshi Katayama; Reza Sari Motlagh; Christian D Fankhauser; Agostino Mattei; Marco Moschini; Piotr Chlosta; Bas W G van Rhijn; Jeremy Y C Teoh; Eva Compérat; Marek Babjuk; Mohammad Abufaraj; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Shahrokh F Shariat; Benjamin Pradere
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2022-04-01

Review 9.  How do we manage high-grade T1 bladder cancer? Conservative or aggressive therapy?

Authors:  Seok Joong Yun; Seon-Kyu Kim; Wun-Jae Kim
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2016-06-10

Review 10.  Bacille-Calmette-Guerin non-responders: how to manage.

Authors:  Friedrich-Carl von Rundstedt; Seth P Lerner
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2015-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.