Literature DB >> 18306962

Orienting to counterpredictive gaze and arrow cues.

Jason Tipples1.   

Abstract

In separate experiments, counterpredictive arrow, eye gaze, or abrupt-onset cues were used to test the hypothesis that individual differences in voluntary control influence involuntary orienting. In contrast with previous findings (Friesen, Ristic, & Kingstone, 2004), involuntary orienting effects were found for arrow cues.Furthermore, for both eye gaze and arrow cues, individual differences in voluntarycontrol were associatedwith involuntary orienting: Involuntary orienting effects were larger for participants who were more effective at using the cue to reorient attention, and also for participants who reported greater ability to control attention. Orienting to abrupt-onset cues was not correlated to individual differences in self-reported attentional control. The findings show that eye gaze and arrow cues instigate similar involuntary and voluntary effects and that involuntary orienting to symbolic cues is linked to individual differences in voluntary control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18306962     DOI: 10.3758/pp.70.1.77

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  37 in total

1.  The uniqueness of social attention revisited: working memory load interferes with endogenous but not social orienting.

Authors:  Dana A Hayward; Jelena Ristic
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Reflexive social attention is mapped according to effector-specific reference systems.

Authors:  Filippo Crostella; Filippo Carducci; Salvatore M Aglioti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Visual attention and action: How cueing, direct mapping, and social interactions drive orienting.

Authors:  Mark A Atkinson; Andrew A Simpson; Geoff G Cole
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

4.  Social orienting: reflexive versus voluntary control.

Authors:  Julia L Hill; Saumil Patel; Xue Gu; Nassim S Seyedali; Jocelyne Bachevalier; Anne B Sereno
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Implicit social learning in relation to autistic-like traits.

Authors:  Matthew Hudson; Tanja C W Nijboer; Tjeerd Jellema
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2012-12

6.  Activation of frontoparietal attention networks by non-predictive gaze and arrow cues.

Authors:  Robert M Joseph; Zachary Fricker; Brandon Keehn
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Arrows don't look at you: Qualitatively different attentional mechanisms triggered by gaze and arrows.

Authors:  Andrea Marotta; Rafael Román-Caballero; Juan Lupiáñez
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

8.  Impaired reflexive orienting to social cues in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Andrea Marotta; Maria Casagrande; Caterina Rosa; Lisa Maccari; Bianca Berloco; Augusto Pasini
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 4.785

9.  Predictive gaze cues affect face evaluations: The effect of facial emotion.

Authors:  Andrew P Bayliss; Debra Griffiths; Steven P Tipper
Journal:  Eur J Cogn Psychol       Date:  2009-01-20

10.  Differential activation of frontoparietal attention networks by social and symbolic spatial cues.

Authors:  Andrew D Engell; Lauri Nummenmaa; Nikolaas N Oosterhof; Richard N Henson; James V Haxby; Andrew J Calder
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 3.436

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.