Literature DB >> 18306303

Recollection and familiarity in hippocampal amnesia.

Patrizia Turriziani1, Laura Serra, Lucia Fadda, Carlo Caltagirone, Giovanni Augusto Carlesimo.   

Abstract

Currently, there is a general agreement that two distinct cognitive operations, recollection and familiarity, contribute to performance on recognition memory tests. However, there is a controversy about whether recollection and familiarity reflect different memory processes, mediated by distinct neural substrates (dual-process models), or whether they are the expression of memory traces of different strength in the context of a unitary declarative memory system (unitary-strength models). Critical in this debate is the status of recognition memory in hippocampal amnesia and, in particular, whether the various structures in the medial temporal lobe (MTL) contribute differentially to the recollection and familiarity components of recognition. The present study aimed to explore the relative contribution of recollection and familiarity to recognition of words that had been previously read or that had been previously generated in a group of severely amnesic patients with cerebral damage restricted to the hippocampus. A convergent pattern of results emerged when we used a subjective-based (remember/know; R/K) and an objective-based (process dissociation procedure; PDP) methods to estimate the contribution of recollection and familiarity to recognition performance. In both PDP and R/K procedures, healthy controls disclosed significantly higher recollection estimates for words that had been anagrammed than for words that had been read. Amnesic patients' recollection scores were not different for words that had been generated or that had been read, and the recollection estimate for words that had been generated was significantly reduced as compared to the group of healthy controls. For familiarity, both healthy controls and amnesic patients recognized as familiar more words that had been generated than words that had been read, and there was no difference between the two groups. These data support the hypothesis of a specific role of the hippocampus in recollection processes and suggest that other components of the MTL (e.g., perirhinal cortex) may be more involved in the process of familiarity. 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18306303     DOI: 10.1002/hipo.20412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hippocampus        ISSN: 1050-9631            Impact factor:   3.899


  20 in total

1.  The process-dissociation approach two decades later: convergence, boundary conditions, and new directions.

Authors:  Andrew P Yonelinas; Larry L Jacoby
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-07

2.  Recognition memory and the hippocampus: A test of the hippocampal contribution to recollection and familiarity.

Authors:  Annette Jeneson; C Brock Kirwan; Ramona O Hopkins; John T Wixted; Larry R Squire
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Recall versus familiarity when recall fails for words and scenes: the differential roles of the hippocampus, perirhinal cortex, and category-specific cortical regions.

Authors:  Anthony J Ryals; Anne M Cleary; Carol A Seger
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Neural correlates of familiarity-based associative retrieval.

Authors:  Jaclyn Hennessey Ford; Mieke Verfaellie; Kelly S Giovanello
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Impaired capacity for familiarity after hippocampal damage.

Authors:  Zhuang Song; John T Wixted; Ramona O Hopkins; Larry R Squire
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Recollection and familiarity: examining controversial assumptions and new directions.

Authors:  Andrew P Yonelinas; Mariam Aly; Wei-Chun Wang; Joshua D Koen
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.899

7.  The contribution of familiarity to recognition memory is a function of test format when using similar foils.

Authors:  Ellen Migo; Daniela Montaldi; Kenneth A Norman; Joel Quamme; Andrew Mayes
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  Assessing recollection and familiarity of similar lures in a behavioral pattern separation task.

Authors:  Jennifer Kim; Michael A Yassa
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 3.899

Review 9.  The hippocampus supports high-resolution binding in the service of perception, working memory and long-term memory.

Authors:  Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Decreases in recollective experience following acute alcohol: a dose-response study.

Authors:  James A Bisby; Julie R Leitz; Celia J A Morgan; H Valerie Curran
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.