PURPOSE: To describe long-term results of a multimodality strategy for stage III breast cancer utilizing neoadjuvant doxorubicin followed by mastectomy, CMF, and radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with biopsy-proven, clinical stage III breast cancer and adequate organ function were eligible. Neoadjuvant doxorubicin (30 mg/m(2) days 1-3, every 28 days for 4 cycles) was followed by mastectomy, in stable or responding patients. Sixteen weeks of postoperative CMF followed (continuous oral cyclophosphamide (2 mg/kg/day); methotrexate (0.7 mg/kg IV) and fluorouracil (12 mg/kg IV) weekly, weeks 1-8, and than biweekly, weeks 9-16). Radiation therapy followed adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: Clinical response rate was 71% (79/111, 95% CI = 62-79%), with 19% complete clinical response. Pathologic complete response was 5% (95% CI = 2-11%). Median follow-up is 15.6 years. Half of the patients progressed by 2.2 years; half died by 5.4 years (range 6 months-15 years). The hazard of dying was greatest in the first 5 years after diagnosis and declined thereafter. Time to progression and overall survival were predicted by number of pathologically involved lymph nodes (TTP: HR [10 vs. 1 node] 2.40, 95% CI = 1.63-3.53, P < 0.0001; OS: HR 2.50, 95% CI = 1.74-3.58, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: After multimodality treatment for locally advanced breast cancer, long-term survival was correlated with the number of pathologically positive lymph nodes, but not to clinical response. The hazard of death was highest during the first 5 years after diagnosis and declined thereafter, indicating a possible intermediate endpoint for future trials of neoadjuvant treatment.
PURPOSE: To describe long-term results of a multimodality strategy for stage III breast cancer utilizing neoadjuvant doxorubicin followed by mastectomy, CMF, and radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with biopsy-proven, clinical stage III breast cancer and adequate organ function were eligible. Neoadjuvant doxorubicin (30 mg/m(2) days 1-3, every 28 days for 4 cycles) was followed by mastectomy, in stable or responding patients. Sixteen weeks of postoperative CMF followed (continuous oral cyclophosphamide (2 mg/kg/day); methotrexate (0.7 mg/kg IV) and fluorouracil (12 mg/kg IV) weekly, weeks 1-8, and than biweekly, weeks 9-16). Radiation therapy followed adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: Clinical response rate was 71% (79/111, 95% CI = 62-79%), with 19% complete clinical response. Pathologic complete response was 5% (95% CI = 2-11%). Median follow-up is 15.6 years. Half of the patients progressed by 2.2 years; half died by 5.4 years (range 6 months-15 years). The hazard of dying was greatest in the first 5 years after diagnosis and declined thereafter. Time to progression and overall survival were predicted by number of pathologically involved lymph nodes (TTP: HR [10 vs. 1 node] 2.40, 95% CI = 1.63-3.53, P < 0.0001; OS: HR 2.50, 95% CI = 1.74-3.58, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: After multimodality treatment for locally advanced breast cancer, long-term survival was correlated with the number of pathologically positive lymph nodes, but not to clinical response. The hazard of death was highest during the first 5 years after diagnosis and declined thereafter, indicating a possible intermediate endpoint for future trials of neoadjuvant treatment.
Authors: J D Cunningham; S E Weiss; S Ahmed; J M Bratton; I J Bleiweiss; P I Tartter; S T Brower Journal: Cancer Invest Date: 1998 Impact factor: 2.176
Authors: S M Swain; R A Sorace; C S Bagley; D N Danforth; J Bader; M N Wesley; S M Steinberg; M E Lippman Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1987-07-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: G Bonadonna; P Valagussa; C Brambilla; L Ferrari; A Moliterni; M Terenziani; M Zambetti Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1998-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Donald A Berry; Constance Cirrincione; I Craig Henderson; Marc L Citron; Daniel R Budman; Lori J Goldstein; Silvana Martino; Edith A Perez; Hyman B Muss; Larry Norton; Clifford Hudis; Eric P Winer Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-04-12 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Samuel W Beenken; Marshall M Urist; Yuting Zhang; Renee Desmond; Helen Krontiras; Heriberto Medina; Kirby I Bland Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: P M Ravdin; H A Burris; G Cook; P Eisenberg; M Kane; W A Bierman; J Mortimer; E Genevois; R E Bellet Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1995-12 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: V Valero; F A Holmes; R S Walters; R L Theriault; L Esparza; G Fraschini; G A Fonseca; R E Bellet; A U Buzdar; G N Hortobagyi Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1995-12 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Bohuslav Melichar; Helena Hornychová; Hana Kalábová; Hana Bašová; Jindřiška Mergancová; Hana Urminská; Pavel Jandík; Vladimír Cervinka; Jan Laco; Aleš Ryška Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2012-03-06 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: José P Leone; Bernardo A Leone; Nabihah Tayob; Michael J Hassett; Julieta Leone; Rachel A Freedman; Sara M Tolaney; Eric P Winer; Carlos T Vallejo; Nancy U Lin Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2021-02-16 Impact factor: 4.872