Literature DB >> 18305965

Restricted within-habitat movement and time-constrained egg laying of female Maculinea rebeli butterflies.

Adám Korösi1, Noémi Orvössy, Péter Batáry, Szilvia Kövér, László Peregovits.   

Abstract

The movement of butterflies within habitat patches is usually assumed to be random, although few studies have shown this unambiguously. In the case of the highly specialized genus Maculinea, two contradictory hypotheses exist to explain the movement and distribution of imagos within patches: (1) due to the high spatial variance of survival rates among caterpillars, the "risk-spreading" hypothesis predicts that females will tend to make linear flight paths in order to maximize their net displacement and scatter the eggs as widely as possible; and (2) recent mark-release-recapture (MRR) data suggest that within-habitat displacement of some Maculinea species is constrained and that adults may establish home ranges. We tested both hypothesis by analysing the movement pattern of individuals. We also investigated whether egg laying is time constrained, which would enhance the trade-off between flying and egg laying. Thirty females of Maculinea rebeli (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) were tracked within a single population in Central Hungary. Their egg-laying behaviour and individual patterns of movement were recorded, and the latter were compared with random walk model predictions. The population was also sampled by MRR to estimate survival rates, and four non-mated, freshly eclosed females were dissected to assess their potential egg load. Net squared displacement of females was significantly lower than predicted by the random walk model and declined continuously after the 15th move. The ratio of net displacement and cumulative move length decreased with the number of moves, supporting the hypothesis that Maculinea butterflies establish home ranges. We found that low survival and a low rate of egg laying prevented females from laying their potential number of eggs within their lifespan. Time limitation increased the cost of movement, providing another possible explanation for the restricted movement of females.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18305965     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-008-0986-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  16 in total

1.  Nonrandom movement behavior at habitat boundaries in two butterfly species: implications for dispersal.

Authors:  L Conradt; T J Roper
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.499

2.  Evolutionary biology: butterfly mimics of ants.

Authors:  Jeremy A Thomas; Josef Settele
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-11-18       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Fitness consequences of choosy oviposition for a time-limited butterfly.

Authors:  Patricia Doak; Peter Kareiva; Joel Kingsolver
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.499

4.  The importance of behavioural studies in conservation biology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.844

5.  Influence of host-plant density and male harassment on the distribution of female Euphydryas anicia (Nymphalidae).

Authors:  F J Odendaal; P Turchin; F R Stermitz
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Food-plant niche selection rather than the presence of ant nests explains oviposition patterns in the myrmecophilous butterfly genus Maculinea.

Authors:  J A Thomas; G W Elmes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Does the presence of ant nests matter for oviposition to a specialized myrmecophilous Maculinea butterfly?

Authors:  H van Dyck; J G Oostermeijer; W Talloen; V Feenstra; A van der Hidde; I Wynhoff
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Non-random dispersal in the butterfly Maniola jurtina: implications for metapopulation models.

Authors:  L Conradt; E J Bodsworth; T J Roper; C D Thomas
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Larval niche selection and evening exposure enhance adoption of a predacious social parasite, Maculinea arion (large blue butterfly), by Myrmica ants.

Authors:  J Thomas
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  The evolution of alternative parasitic life histories in large blue butterflies.

Authors:  Thomas D Als; Roger Vila; Nikolai P Kandul; David R Nash; Shen-Horn Yen; Yu-Feng Hsu; André A Mignault; Jacobus J Boomsma; Naomi E Pierce
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-11-18       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  10 in total

1.  Patterns of host use by brood parasitic Maculinea butterflies across Europe.

Authors:  András Tartally; Jeremy A Thomas; Christian Anton; Emilio Balletto; Francesca Barbero; Simona Bonelli; Markus Bräu; Luca Pietro Casacci; Sándor Csősz; Zsolt Czekes; Matthias Dolek; Izabela Dziekańska; Graham Elmes; Matthias A Fürst; Uta Glinka; Michael E Hochberg; Helmut Höttinger; Vladimir Hula; Dirk Maes; Miguel L Munguira; Martin Musche; Per Stadel Nielsen; Piotr Nowicki; Paula S Oliveira; László Peregovits; Sylvia Ritter; Birgit C Schlick-Steiner; Josef Settele; Marcin Sielezniew; David J Simcox; Anna M Stankiewicz; Florian M Steiner; Giedrius Švitra; Line V Ugelvig; Hans Van Dyck; Zoltán Varga; Magdalena Witek; Michal Woyciechowski; Irma Wynhoff; David R Nash
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Avoidance and aggregation create consistent egg distribution patterns of congeneric caddisflies across spatially variable oviposition landscapes.

Authors:  Jill Lancaster; Barbara J Downes; Rebecca E Lester; Stephen P Rice
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Host ant independent oviposition in the parasitic butterfly Maculinea alcon.

Authors:  Matthias A Fürst; David R Nash
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  The importance of including habitat-specific behaviour in models of butterfly movement.

Authors:  Luke C Evans; Richard M Sibly; Pernille Thorbek; Ian Sims; Tom H Oliver; Richard J Walters
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Sexual differences in age-dependent survival and life span of adults in a natural butterfly population.

Authors:  Marcin Sielezniew; Agata Kostro-Ambroziak; Ádám Kőrösi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Sex-biased topography effects on butterfly dispersal.

Authors:  Elisa Plazio; Terezie Bubová; Vladimír Vrabec; Piotr Nowicki
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 3.600

7.  Restoring a butterfly hot spot by large ungulates refaunation: the case of the Milovice military training range, Czech Republic.

Authors:  Martin Konvička; David Ričl; Veronika Vodičková; Jiří Beneš; Miloslav Jirků
Journal:  BMC Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-04-30

8.  Host plant use drives genetic differentiation in syntopic populations of Maculinea alcon.

Authors:  András Tartally; Andreas Kelager; Matthias A Fürst; David R Nash
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Integrating the influence of weather into mechanistic models of butterfly movement.

Authors:  Luke C Evans; Richard M Sibly; Pernille Thorbek; Ian Sims; Tom H Oliver; Richard J Walters
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 3.600

10.  Intersexual Differences in Behaviour and Resource Use of Specialist Phengaris teleius Butterflies.

Authors:  Miloš Popović; Ana Golubović; Piotr Nowicki
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2022-03-06       Impact factor: 2.769

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.