Literature DB >> 18305927

On the use of different mass spectrometric techniques for characterization of sequence variability in genomic DNA.

Herbert Oberacher1.   

Abstract

After completion of the human genome sequence the search for differences among individual genomes has become the centre of focus for geneticists. Two different types of polymorphism-single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and short tandem repeats (STRs)-are major sources of genetic diversity and are of widespread use in genetic analysis. A plethora of genotyping techniques have been developed, and mass spectrometry (MS) is among the most widely used analytical platforms. The most striking advantage of mass spectrometric genotyping assays over others is the use of the measured molecular mass information for allele calling. The molecular mass is less error-prone than other sequence-specific parameters, including migration times, retention times, or hybridization yields, as it represents an intrinsic property of a nucleic acid molecule that is directly related to its nucleotide composition. Mass spectrometric assays can roughly be divided into two major groups-matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI)-based and electrospray ionization (ESI)-based assays. An important subdivision of ESI-based genotyping methods are approaches that originate from the hyphenation of liquid chromatography (LC) to MS. The principles of these three classes of mass spectrometric genotyping techniques are summarized in this review. Possibilities and limitations are critically discussed to assist scientists, especially non-experts in MS, in choosing the appropriate mass spectrometric assay for genotyping a genetic marker of interest. [figure: see text]

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18305927     DOI: 10.1007/s00216-008-1929-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem        ISSN: 1618-2642            Impact factor:   4.142


  3 in total

1.  Multiphoton dissociation of electrosprayed megadalton-sized DNA ions in a charge-detection mass spectrometer.

Authors:  Tristan Doussineau; Pierre Paletto; Philippe Dugourd; Rodolphe Antoine
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Increasing the discrimination power of forensic STR testing by employing high-performance mass spectrometry, as illustrated in indigenous South African and Central Asian populations.

Authors:  Florian Pitterl; Konrad Schmidt; Gabriela Huber; Bettina Zimmermann; Rhena Delport; Sylvain Amory; Bertrand Ludes; Herbert Oberacher; Walther Parson
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2010-01-16       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Improved Polymerase Chain Reaction-restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Genotyping of Toxic Pufferfish by Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Hajime Miyaguchi
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 1.355

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.