Literature DB >> 18304886

Colonoscopy completion in a large safety net health care system.

Elina S Kazarian1, Fernando S Carreira, Neil W Toribara, Thomas D Denberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Anecdotally, patients in safety net health care systems have difficulty completing screening and diagnostic colonoscopies, but this is poorly characterized. It is important to understand this phenomenon to improve low rates of colorectal cancer screening in vulnerable populations and to ensure that patients with signs and symptoms complete medically indicated colonoscopic evaluations.
METHODS: We performed a 6-month retrospective review of outpatient endoscopy laboratory scheduling and procedure logs and electronic medical records at Denver Health Medical Center (DHMC), a large safety net health care system, to describe rates and sociodemographic predictors of colonoscopy nonattendance and inadequate (fair/poor) bowel preparation. Predictor variables included patient age, gender, race/ethnicity, procedure indication, and insurance type.
RESULTS: The nonattendance rate was 41.7% for all scheduled outpatient colonoscopies without difference between screening and diagnostic procedures. Consistent with non-safety net systems, the rate of inadequate bowel preparation was 30.2%; however, the rate of poor bowel preparation that absolutely precluded an exam was 9.9%. Correctional care patients had markedly higher rates of nonattendance and inadequate bowel preparation compared with other groups.
CONCLUSIONS: A very large proportion of patients scheduled for colonoscopy in a large safety net health care system do not attend their procedures, and among those who do, there is a high rate of inadequate bowel preparation leading to incomplete and aborted evaluations. Interventions are needed to promote the more efficient use of a limited and expensive resource and to achieve higher rates of screening and medically indicated diagnostic colonoscopies in vulnerable patient populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18304886     DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  45 in total

1.  Electronic Health Record Algorithm Development for Research Subject Recruitment Using Colonoscopy Appointment Scheduling.

Authors:  Jeanette M Daly; Kim Parang; Barcey T Levy
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2021 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.657

2.  Patient Non-adherence and Cancellations Are Higher for Screening Colonoscopy Compared with Surveillance Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Michael Greenspan; Navdeep Chehl; Krista Shawron; Lisa Barnes; Hong Li; Elizabeth Avery; Shannon Sims; John Losurdo; Sohrab Mobarhan; Joshua Melson
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Analysis of YouTubeTM videos related to bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Corey Hannah Basch; Grace Clarke Hillyer; Rachel Reeves; Charles E Basch
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-09-16

4.  Split dose and MiraLAX-based purgatives to enhance bowel preparation quality becoming common recommendations in the US.

Authors:  Grace Clarke Hillyer; Benjamin Lebwohl; Corey H Basch; Charles E Basch; Fay Kastrinos; Beverly J Insel; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.409

5.  Using a multifaceted approach to improve the follow-up of positive fecal occult blood test results.

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Himabindu Kadiyala; Gayathri Bhagwath; Anila Shethia; Hashem El-Serag; Annette Walder; Maria E Velez; Laura A Petersen
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Risk factors for inadequate colonoscopy bowel preparations in African Americans and whites at an urban medical center.

Authors:  Anoop Appannagari; Shikha Mangla; Chuanhong Liao; K Gautham Reddy; Sonia S Kupfer
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 0.954

7.  Physician recommendations and patient adherence after inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Reena V Chokshi; Christine E Hovis; Graham A Colditz; Dayna S Early; Jean S Wang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Outcomes of Next-Day Versus Non-next-Day Colonoscopy After an Initial Inadequate Bowel Preparation.

Authors:  Christopher John Murphy; N Jewel Samadder; Kristen Cox; Ronak Iqbal; Brian So; Daniel Croxford; John C Fang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Patient-Reported Attributions for Missed Colonoscopy Appointments in Two Large Healthcare Systems.

Authors:  Viraj Bhise; Varsha Modi; Anisha Kalavar; Donna Espadas; Loretta Hanser; Milena Gould; Hashem B El-Serag; Hardeep Singh
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Shortened surveillance intervals following suboptimal bowel preparation for colonoscopy: results of a national survey.

Authors:  Grace Clarke Hillyer; Corey H Basch; Benjamin Lebwohl; Charles E Basch; Fay Kastrinos; Beverly J Insel; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-08-12       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.