Literature DB >> 18304555

Effects of a hip belt on transverse plane trunk coordination and stability during load carriage.

S R Sharpe1, K G Holt, E Saltzman, R C Wagenaar.   

Abstract

This study examined the transverse plane kinematics of the pelvis, thorax and head while participants walked at a range of speeds on a treadmill under three load conditions: no load, with a loaded backpack with no hip belt and with a loaded backpack with a hip belt. Research has suggested that one mechanism for adapting to heavy loads carried with no hip belt is to reduce the amplitudes and relative phase of transverse plane pelvic and thoracic rotations, in order to minimize rotational torque on the loaded upper body. Transverse plane rotation amplitudes of the pelvis, thorax, backpack and head were calculated from 3D kinematic data for 12 healthy subjects, walking at speeds of 0.5, 0.9, 1.3 and 1.7 ms(-1). Relative phase relation and its variability were also computed for pelvis-thorax rotations and backpack-thorax rotations. Stability of the coordination pattern was estimated as an inverse function of the variability in relative phase. The backpack with the hip belt allowed significantly larger transverse plane rotation amplitudes, along with increased stability of the coordination pattern, than the backpack with no hip belt. Motion patterns of the backpack and thorax suggested that the backpack frame was used to assist with the deceleration and reversal of the loaded thorax, driven by the pelvis through the hip belt connection. Use of the frame in this way may have required less trunk muscle activation and allowed for improved pattern stability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18304555     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.12.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  8 in total

1.  A comparison of the physiological consequences of head-loading and back-loading for African and European women.

Authors:  R Lloyd; B Parr; S Davies; T Partridge; C Cooke
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Factors affecting shoulder-pelvic integration during axial trunk rotation in subjects with recurrent low back pain.

Authors:  Woo-Hyung Park; Yoon Hyuk Kim; Tae Ro Lee; Paul S Sung
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Impact of Backpacks on Ergonomics: Biomechanical and Physiological Effects: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Matteo Genitrini; Francesca Dotti; Eleonora Bianca; Ada Ferri
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Side differences of the lateral abdominal wall in supine rest position in mild adolescent idiopathic thoracolumbar scoliosis.

Authors:  Pawel Linek; Tomasz Wolny; Edward Saulicz; Andrzej Mysliwiec
Journal:  Turk J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-08-22

5.  Validation of an instrumented dummy to assess mechanical aspects of discomfort during load carriage.

Authors:  Patrick D Wettenschwiler; Simon Annaheim; Silvio Lorenzetti; Stephen J Ferguson; Rolf Stämpfli; Agnes Psikuta; René M Rossi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The Influence of Backpack Weight and Hip Belt Tension on Movement and Loading in the Pelvis and Lower Limbs during Walking.

Authors:  Katja Oberhofer; Patrick D Wettenschwiler; Navrag Singh; Stephen J Ferguson; Simon Annaheim; Rene M Rossi; Silvio Lorenzetti
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 1.781

7.  Tibiofemoral joint contact forces increase with load magnitude and walking speed but remain almost unchanged with different types of carried load.

Authors:  Gavin K Lenton; Peter J Bishop; David J Saxby; Tim L A Doyle; Claudio Pizzolato; Daniel Billing; David G Lloyd
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Mechanical Predictors of Discomfort during Load Carriage.

Authors:  Patrick D Wettenschwiler; Silvio Lorenzetti; Rolf Stämpfli; René M Rossi; Stephen J Ferguson; Simon Annaheim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.