Literature DB >> 18303936

Efficacy and tolerability of nebivolol compared with other antihypertensive drugs: a meta-analysis.

Luc M Van Bortel1, Francesco Fici, Flavio Mascagni.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Lowering BP to normal levels without quality of life deterioration is the most important means of reducing cardiovascular risk. Recent studies have challenged the position of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists (beta-blockers) as first-line antihypertensive drugs. Nebivolol is a third-generation, highly selective beta(1)-blocker that causes vasodilation through nitric oxide (NO) release. This meta-analysis investigates the efficacy and tolerability of nebivolol compared with other antihypertensive drugs and placebo in patients with hypertension.
METHODS: Twelve randomized controlled studies were included in which nebivolol 5 mg once daily was compared with the recommended clinical doses of other antihypertensive drugs (n = 9), placebo (n = 2), and both (n = 1). The clinical studies were selected after a MEDLINE search up to 2007 using the key words 'nebivolol' and 'hypertension.'
RESULTS: Antihypertensive response rates (the percentage of patients achieving target BP levels or a defined DBP reduction) were higher with nebivolol than with ACE inhibitors (odds ratio [OR] 1.92; p = 0.001) and all antihypertensive drugs combined (OR 1.41; p = 0.001) and similar to beta-blockers, calcium channel antagonists (CCAs) and the angiotensin receptor antagonist (ARA) losartan. Moreover, a higher percentage of patients receiving nebivolol achieved target BP levels compared with patients treated with losartan (OR 1.98; p = 0.004), CCAs (OR 1.44; p = 0.024), and all antihypertensive drugs combined (OR 1.35; p = 0.012). The percentage of patients experiencing adverse events did not differ between nebivolol and placebo; adverse event rates were significantly lower with nebivolol than losartan (OR 0.52; p = 0.016), other beta-blockers (OR 0.56; p = 0.007), nifedipine (OR 0.49; p < 0.001), and all antihypertensive drugs combined (OR 0.59; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Results of previous pharmacokinetic studies suggest that nebivolol 5 mg may not conform completely to the definition of a classic beta-blocker demonstrating additional antihypertensive effect due to endothelial NO release-mediated vasodilation. This meta-analysis showed that nebivolol 5 mg achieved similar or better rates of treatment response and BP normalization than other drug classes and other antihypertensive drugs combined, with similar tolerability to placebo and significantly better tolerability than losartan, CCAs, other beta-blockers, and all antihypertensive drugs combined. Although not definitive, this meta-analysis suggests that nebivolol 5 mg is likely to have advantages over existing antihypertensives and may have a role in the first-line treatment of hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18303936     DOI: 10.2165/00129784-200808010-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Drugs        ISSN: 1175-3277            Impact factor:   3.571


  17 in total

1.  Hypertension treatment in the Asia-Pacific: the role of and treatment strategies with nebivolol.

Authors:  Cheol-Ho Kim; Nelson Abelardo; Peera Buranakitjaroen; Rungroj Krittayaphong; Chin Hock Lim; Sung-Ha Park; Nguyen Vinh Pham; Gregorio Rogelio; Bernard Wong; Lip Ping Low
Journal:  Heart Asia       Date:  2016-02-24

2.  The selective beta1-adrenoceptor antagonist nebivolol is a potential oestrogen receptor agonist with neuroprotective abilities.

Authors:  D Manthey; M Gamerdinger; C Behl
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 3.  Optimal use of beta-blockers in high-risk hypertension: a guide to dosing equivalence.

Authors:  Janet B McGill
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2010-06-01

4.  Nebivolol/Hydrochlorothiazide : a new fixed-dose combination for effective simplified antihypertensive therapy.

Authors:  Ettore Malacco
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2013-01-03

Review 5.  Nebivolol: impact on cardiac and endothelial function and clinical utility.

Authors:  Jorge Eduardo Toblli; Federico DiGennaro; Jorge Fernando Giani; Fernando Pablo Dominici
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2012-03-13

6.  A Single-Center, Open-Label, 3-Way Crossover Trial to Determine the Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Interaction Between Nebivolol and Valsartan in Healthy Volunteers at Steady State.

Authors:  Chun Lin Chen; Daksha Desai-Krieger; Stephan Ortiz; Majid Kerolous; Harold M Wright; Parviz Ghahramani
Journal:  Am J Ther       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.688

7.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of nebivolol and metoprolol in essential hypertension: a pharmacoeconomic comparison of antihypertensive efficacy of beta blockers.

Authors:  Rachna S Patel; Kamal H Sharma; Nitisha A Kamath; Nirav H Patel; Ankita M Thakkar
Journal:  Indian J Pharmacol       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.200

8.  Nebivolol, But Not Metoprolol, Treatment Improves Endothelial Fibrinolytic Capacity in Adults With Elevated Blood Pressure.

Authors:  Brian L Stauffer; Caitlin A Dow; Kyle J Diehl; Tyler D Bammert; Jared J Greiner; Christopher A DeSouza
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 9.  Protective effects of nebivolol from oxidative stress to prevent hypertension-related target organ damage.

Authors:  A Coats; S Jain
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 3.012

10.  Rhabdomyolysis in a patient taking nebivolol.

Authors:  Ye Jin Kim; Hae Ri Kim; Hong Jae Jeon; Hyun Jun Ju; Sarah Chung; Dae Eun Choi; Kang Wook Lee; Ki Ryang Na
Journal:  Kidney Res Clin Pract       Date:  2016-01-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.