Literature DB >> 18303802

Cortical neural prosthesis performance improves when eye position is monitored.

Aaron P Batista1, Byron M Yu, Gopal Santhanam, Stephen I Ryu, Afsheen Afshar, Krishna V Shenoy.   

Abstract

Neural prostheses that extract signals directly from cortical neurons have recently become feasible as assistive technologies for tetraplegic individuals. Significant effort toward improving the performance of these systems is now warranted. A simple technique that can improve prosthesis performance is to account for the direction of gaze in the operation of the prosthesis. This proposal stems from recent discoveries that the direction of gaze influences neural activity in several areas that are commonly targeted for electrode implantation in neural prosthetics. Here, we first demonstrate that neural prosthesis performance does improve when eye position is taken into account. We then show that eye position can be estimated directly from neural activity, and thus performance gains can be realized even without a device that tracks eye position.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18303802     DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2007.906958

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng        ISSN: 1534-4320            Impact factor:   3.802


  14 in total

Review 1.  Brain control and information transfer.

Authors:  Edward J Tehovnik; Lewis L Chen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Motor-related signals in the intraparietal cortex encode locations in a hybrid, rather than eye-centered reference frame.

Authors:  O'Dhaniel A Mullette-Gillman; Yale E Cohen; Jennifer M Groh
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 3.  Interfacing to the brain's motor decisions.

Authors:  Giovanni Mirabella; Mikhail А Lebedev
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The critical stability task: quantifying sensory-motor control during ongoing movement in nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Kristin M Quick; Jessica L Mischel; Patrick J Loughlin; Aaron P Batista
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Challenges and opportunities for next-generation intracortically based neural prostheses.

Authors:  Vikash Gilja; Cindy A Chestek; Ilka Diester; Jaimie M Henderson; Karl Deisseroth; Krishna V Shenoy
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Decoding with limited neural data: a mixture of time-warped trajectory models for directional reaches.

Authors:  Elaine A Corbett; Eric J Perreault; Konrad P Körding
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  Adaptive offset correction for intracortical brain-computer interfaces.

Authors:  Mark L Homer; Janos A Perge; Michael J Black; Matthew T Harrison; Sydney S Cash; Leigh R Hochberg
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 8.  Cognitive neural prosthetics.

Authors:  Richard A Andersen; Eun Jung Hwang; Grant H Mulliken
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 9.  Sensors and decoding for intracortical brain computer interfaces.

Authors:  Mark L Homer; Arto V Nurmikko; John P Donoghue; Leigh R Hochberg
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 9.590

10.  Dealing with target uncertainty in a reaching control interface.

Authors:  Elaine A Corbett; Konrad P Körding; Eric J Perreault
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.