Literature DB >> 18303547

Management options for lower pole renal calculi.

Jay D Raman1, Margaret S Pearle.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The optimal treatment of lower pole renal calculi is controversial. Shock wave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy all constitute viable therapeutic options in select patients. RECENT
FINDINGS: Lower pole stones smaller than 1 cm in diameter can be managed with observation, shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy. Patients electing expectant management should be counseled regarding the potential for stone-related symptom progression and need for future intervention. Shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy have similar stone-free rates, although shock wave lithotripsy may be preferable due to more favorable secondary outcomes. Lower pole stones 1-2 cm in diameter are best managed with percutaneous nephrostolithotomy, although ureteroscopy is an option in select patients, particularly those not considered candidates for percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. Finally, patients with lower pole stones larger than 2 cm are best served with percutaneous nephrostolithotomy, as the morbidity in experienced hands is low and stone-free rates are unequivocally higher than those of other treatment modalities.
SUMMARY: A variety of factors, including patient body habitus, local renal anatomy, cost and patient preference, must be taken into consideration when determining the optimal treatment modality for lower pole renal calculi.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18303547     DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e3282f517ea

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Urol        ISSN: 0963-0643            Impact factor:   2.309


  10 in total

1.  Does previous failed ESWL have a negative impact of on the outcome of ureterorenoscopy? A matched pair analysis.

Authors:  Prodromos Philippou; David Payne; Kim Davenport; Anthony G Timoney; Francis X Keeley
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Management behaviors of the urology practitioners to the small lower calyceal stones: the results of a web-based survey.

Authors:  Ferhat Ates; Murat Zor; Omer Yılmaz; Murat Tuncer; Metin Ozturk; Cenk Gurbuz; Gokhan Atis; Orhan Koca; Asif Yildirim; Bilal Eryildirim; Eyup Veli Kucuk; Fehmi Narter; Temucin Senkul; Kemal Sarica
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 3.  Asymptomatic Renal Stones-to Treat or Not to Treat.

Authors:  Necole M Streeper
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Flexible ureterorenoscopy (F-URS) with holmium laser versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for treatment of renal stone <2 cm: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Mi; Kewei Ren; Haiyan Pan; Lijie Zhu; Sheng Wu; Xiaoming You; Hongbao Shao; Feng Dai; Tao Peng; Feng Qin; Jian Wang; Yi Huang
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Difference of opinion--In the era of flexible ureteroscopy is there still a place for Shock-wave lithotripsy? Opinion: YES.

Authors:  J F Donaldson
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

6.  Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) vs retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in the management of renal calculi ≤ 2 cm: a propensity matched study.

Authors:  Sunil Bhaskara Pillai; Arun Chawla; Jean de la Rosette; Pilar Laguna; Rajsekhar Guddeti; Suraj Jayadeva Reddy; Ravindra Sabnis; Arvind Ganpule; Mahesh Desai; Aditya Parikh
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy vs. percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs. flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower-pole stones.

Authors:  Thomas Knoll; Noor Buchholz; Gunnar Wendt-Nordahl
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2012-07-24

Review 8.  Economic impact of urinary stones.

Authors:  Elias S Hyams; Brian R Matlaga
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2014-09

9.  Role of pelvicalyceal anatomy in the outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for lower pole stones: outcomes with a systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Sulaiman Sadaf Karim; Luke Hanna; Robert Geraghty; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  External physical vibration lithecbole facilitating the expulsion of upper ureteric stones 1.0-2.0 cm after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Rong-Zhen Tao; Qing-Lai Tang; Shuang Zhou; Chun-Ping Jia; Jian-Lin Lv
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 3.436

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.