Literature DB >> 18303503

Assisted reproductive technology, congenital malformations, and epigenetic disease.

Louise Wilkins-Haug1.   

Abstract

In the 3 decades since the birth of the first in vitro fertilization-conceived child, assisted reproduction technologies were rapidly assimilated into clinical care and are now responsible for 1% to 3% of all livebirths in North America and Europe. The rate of congenital anomalies is low (4% to 6%), though it represents a modest increase over the background rate of major malformations (3%). Additionally, emerging studies of imprinting and epigenetic conditions, those genetic disorders due to changes in DNA transcription without change in DNA sequence, suggest that the preimplantation period is vulnerable to perturbations. Review of these studies provides clinically useful information and a basis for investigations of the long-term effects of assisted reproduction technology on the children conceived.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18303503     DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e318161d25a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0009-9201            Impact factor:   2.190


  8 in total

1.  Effects of in vitro maturation on gene expression in rhesus monkey oocytes.

Authors:  Young S Lee; Keith E Latham; Catherine A Vandevoort
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 3.107

Review 2.  In Vitro fertilization and adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes.

Authors:  Chantae S Sullivan-Pyke; Suneeta Senapati; Monica A Mainigi; Kurt T Barnhart
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 3.300

3.  Preliminary proteomic analysis on the alterations in follicular fluid proteins from women undergoing natural cycles or controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.

Authors:  Yan-Ting Wu; Yan Wu; Jun-Yu Zhang; Ning-Ning Hou; Ai-Xia Liu; Jie-Xue Pan; Jie-Yang Lu; Jian-Zhong Sheng; He-Feng Huang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-01-18       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  Imprinting disorders and assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Carter M Owen; James H Segars
Journal:  Semin Reprod Med       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 1.303

5.  Assisted hatching and intracytoplasmic sperm injection are not associated with improved outcomes in assisted reproduction cycles for diminished ovarian reserve: an analysis of cycles in the United States from 2004 to 2011.

Authors:  Samantha F Butts; Carter Owen; Monica Mainigi; Suneeta Senapati; David B Seifer; Anuja Dokras
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Autism spectrum disorders in IVF children: a national case-control study in Finland.

Authors:  V Lehti; A S Brown; M Gissler; M Rihko; A Suominen; A Sourander
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 7.  Genetic counseling prior to assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Yukiko Katagiri; Yuko Tamaki
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2020-12-31

8.  Comparison of Congenital Abnormalities of Infants Conceived by Assisted Reproductive Techniques versus Infants with Natural Conception in Tehran.

Authors:  Mansoureh Farhangniya; Eshagh Dortaj Rabori; Ramin Mozafari Kermani; Ali Akbar Haghdoost; Abbas Bahrampour; Pezhman Bagheri; Paul A L Lancaster; Mahnaz Ashrafi; Ahmad Vosough Taqi Dizaj; Hamid Gourabi; Abolhassan Shahzadeh Fazeli
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-09-18
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.