OBJECTIVE: Osteoprotegerin (OPG) is an important regulator of bone turnover through its effects on osteoclastogenesis, yet findings from previous studies of circulating OPG and commonly measured bone indices in humans have been conflicting. We conducted a cross-sectional study to evaluate the association between plasma OPG and femoral neck (FN) bone density (BMD) and geometry in a large cohort of women and men. DESIGN: Participants included 1379 postmenopausal women and 1165 men, aged 50-89 yr (mean, 64 yr), in the Framingham Offspring Study. Dual x-ray absorptiometry was used to evaluate FN BMD and geometry (bone width, section modulus, and cross-sectional area at the narrow neck region). Plasma OPG concentrations were measured by ELISA. Sex-specific analysis of covariance was used to calculate means and assess linear trend in BMD and geometry values across OPG quartiles, adjusted for confounders. RESULTS: OPG concentrations were greater in women than men, increased with age, and were greater in smokers and those with diabetes and heart disease. Multivariable-adjusted mean FN BMD in women increased from the lowest to the highest OPG quartile (trend, P < 0.01). However, no linear trend between FN BMD and OPG was observed in men (trend, P = 0.34). Section modulus and bone width increased with OPG in men (trend, P < 0.01), whereas no association between hip geometry indices and OPG was observed in women. CONCLUSION: Higher OPG concentration may indicate greater skeletal strength in women and men, possibly through reducing bone loss in women and increasing periosteal apposition in men.
OBJECTIVE:Osteoprotegerin (OPG) is an important regulator of bone turnover through its effects on osteoclastogenesis, yet findings from previous studies of circulating OPG and commonly measured bone indices in humans have been conflicting. We conducted a cross-sectional study to evaluate the association between plasma OPG and femoral neck (FN) bone density (BMD) and geometry in a large cohort of women and men. DESIGN:Participants included 1379 postmenopausal women and 1165 men, aged 50-89 yr (mean, 64 yr), in the Framingham Offspring Study. Dual x-ray absorptiometry was used to evaluate FN BMD and geometry (bone width, section modulus, and cross-sectional area at the narrow neck region). Plasma OPG concentrations were measured by ELISA. Sex-specific analysis of covariance was used to calculate means and assess linear trend in BMD and geometry values across OPG quartiles, adjusted for confounders. RESULTS:OPG concentrations were greater in women than men, increased with age, and were greater in smokers and those with diabetes and heart disease. Multivariable-adjusted mean FN BMD in women increased from the lowest to the highest OPG quartile (trend, P < 0.01). However, no linear trend between FN BMD and OPG was observed in men (trend, P = 0.34). Section modulus and bone width increased with OPG in men (trend, P < 0.01), whereas no association between hip geometry indices and OPG was observed in women. CONCLUSION: Higher OPG concentration may indicate greater skeletal strength in women and men, possibly through reducing bone loss in women and increasing periosteal apposition in men.
Authors: W S Simonet; D L Lacey; C R Dunstan; M Kelley; M S Chang; R Lüthy; H Q Nguyen; S Wooden; L Bennett; T Boone; G Shimamoto; M DeRose; R Elliott; A Colombero; H L Tan; G Trail; J Sullivan; E Davy; N Bucay; L Renshaw-Gegg; T M Hughes; D Hill; W Pattison; P Campbell; S Sander; G Van; J Tarpley; P Derby; R Lee; W J Boyle Journal: Cell Date: 1997-04-18 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: P J Kostenuik; C Capparelli; S Morony; S Adamu; G Shimamoto; V Shen; D L Lacey; C R Dunstan Journal: Endocrinology Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 4.736
Authors: Ki Won Oh; Eun Jung Rhee; Won Young Lee; San Woo Kim; Eun Sook Oh; Ki Hyun Baek; Moo Il Kang; Moon Gi Choi; Hyung Joon Yoo; Sung Woo Park Journal: Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 3.478
Authors: A Mizuno; N Amizuka; K Irie; A Murakami; N Fujise; T Kanno; Y Sato; N Nakagawa; H Yasuda; S Mochizuki; T Gomibuchi; K Yano; N Shima; N Washida; E Tsuda; T Morinaga; K Higashio; H Ozawa Journal: Biochem Biophys Res Commun Date: 1998-06-29 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: S Khosla; H M Arrighi; L J Melton; E J Atkinson; W M O'Fallon; C Dunstan; B L Riggs Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: David Karasik; Yanhua Zhou; L Adrienne Cupples; Marian T Hannan; Douglas P Kiel; Serkalem Demissie Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Ingrid Bergström; Paolo Parini; Sven A Gustafsson; Göran Andersson; Jonas Brinck Journal: J Bone Miner Metab Date: 2011-08-09 Impact factor: 2.626
Authors: J Coulson; L Bagley; Y Barnouin; S Bradburn; G Butler-Browne; H Gapeyeva; J-Y Hogrel; T Maden-Wilkinson; A B Maier; C Meskers; C Murgatroyd; M Narici; M Pääsuke; L Sassano; S Sipilä; N Al-Shanti; L Stenroth; D A Jones; J S McPhee Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2017-06-05 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: J Tamaki; M Iki; A Morita; Y Ikeda; Y Sato; E Kajita; S Kagamimori; Y Kagawa; H Yoneshima Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2009-05-30 Impact factor: 4.507