Literature DB >> 18301439

Quantifying inbreeding in natural populations of hermaphroditic organisms.

P Jarne1, P David.   

Abstract

We review molecular methods for estimating selfing rates and inbreeding in populations. Two main approaches are available: the population structure approach (PSA) and progeny-array approach (PAA). The PSA approach relies on single-generation samples and produces estimates that integrate the inbreeding history over several generations, but is based on strong assumptions (for example, inbreeding equilibrium). The PSA has classically relied on single-locus inbreeding coefficients averaged over loci. Unfortunately PSA estimates are very sensitive to technical problems such as the occurrence of null alleles at one or more of the loci. Consequently inbreeding might be substantially overestimated, especially in outbred populations. However, the robustness of the PSA has recently been greatly improved by the development of multilocus methods free of such bias. The PAA, on the other hand, is based on the comparison between offspring and mother genotypes. As a consequence, PAA estimates do not reflect long-term inbreeding history but only recent mating events of the maternal individuals studied ('here and now' selfing). In addition to selfing rates, the PAA allows estimating other mating system parameters, including biparental inbreeding and the correlation of selfing among sibs. Although PAA estimates could also be biased by technical problems, incompatibilities between the mother's genotype and her offspring allow the identification and correction of such bias. For all methods, we provide guidelines on the required number of loci and sample sizes. We conclude that the PSA and PAA are equally robust, provided multilocus information is used. Although experimental constraints may make the PAA more demanding, especially in animals, the two methods provide complementary information, and can fruitfully be conducted together.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18301439     DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2008.2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  7 in total

1.  Multilocus estimation of selfing and its heritability.

Authors:  N S McClure; M C Whitlock
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Comparing direct and indirect selfing rate estimates: when are population-structure estimates reliable?

Authors:  A Bürkli; N Sieber; K Seppälä; J Jokela
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  A Bayesian method for the joint estimation of outcrossing rate and inbreeding depression.

Authors:  V A Koelling; P J Monnahan; J K Kelly
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Mixed mating in androdioecious Mercurialis annua inferred using progeny arrays and diploid-acting microsatellite loci in a hexaploid background.

Authors:  Grazyna Korbecka; Alastair Hamilton; John R Pannell
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-02-13       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Conspecific crop-weed introgression influences evolution of weedy rice (Oryza sativa f. spontanea) across a geographical range.

Authors:  Han-Bing Xia; Wei Wang; Hui Xia; Wei Zhao; Bao-Rong Lu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The genetic basis and experimental evolution of inbreeding depression in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  I M Chelo; S Carvalho; M Roque; S R Proulx; H Teotónio
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Lower selfing rates in metallicolous populations than in non-metallicolous populations of the pseudometallophyte Noccaea caerulescens (Brassicaceae) in Southern France.

Authors:  Mathilde Mousset; Patrice David; Christophe Petit; Juliette Pouzadoux; Clémence Hatt; Élodie Flaven; Ophélie Ronce; Agnès Mignot
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 4.357

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.