Literature DB >> 18300983

Secondary malar implant surgery.

Michael J Yaremchuk1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic problems may occur after malar implant surgery. These include asymmetry, displeasing contours (too wide, too large, too low, or too prominent) with time, and symptoms related to infraorbital nerve damage.
METHODS: Implant removal at the time of secondary surgery leaves depressions in the cheek resulting from implant-induced bone erosion and soft-tissue contracture. Secondary surgery requires implant removal, implant replacement with appropriately positioned and sized implants, and cheek resuspension (subperiosteal midface lift) to mask and redistribute implant-induced soft-tissue distortions.
RESULTS: Twenty of the 22 patients were satisfied with their secondary operation. One patient requested another revision and, later, implant removal. Another patient who had been previously treated for infection developed another infection requiring implant removal.
CONCLUSION: Malar implant-related midface deformities can be corrected by implant removal, deficiency-specific implant replacement, and subperiosteal midface resuspension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18300983     DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000298094.57441.63

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  2 in total

1.  Facial aesthetic correction with injectable poly-L-lactic Acid following removal of malar cheek implants.

Authors:  Cherie M Ditre
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2009-06

2.  Treatment of Infected Facial Implants.

Authors:  Kriti Mohan; Joshua A Cox; Ryan M Dickey; Paula Gravina; Anthony Echo; Shayan A Izaddoost; Anh H Nguyen
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.314

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.