OBJECTIVES: Drugs interfering with the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) have been shown to reduce the incidence of stroke in patients at risk and to afford neuroprotection in experimental brain ischemia. This study aimed to compare potential neuroprotective effects of systemic pretreatment with the angiotensin receptor blocker, candesartan, and the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitor, ramipril, in normotensive Wistar rats after focal cerebral ischemia, with special emphasis on the regulation of neurotrophins. METHODS: Equipotent subcutaneous doses of candesartan and ramipril were determined via inhibition of pressor responses to intravenously injected angiotensin II (Ang II) or angiotensin I (Ang I), respectively. Accordingly, animals were treated with candesartan (0.1 mg/kg body weight, twice daily), ramipril (0.01 and 0.1 mg/kg body weight, twice daily) or vehicle (0.9% saline, twice daily), respectively, 5 days prior to middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) with reperfusion. Severity of stroke was estimated via infarct size [magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 48 h after MCAO] and neurological outcome (24 h, 48 h after MCAO). Measurements of neurotrophins/receptors in brain tissue were performed 48 h after MCAO. RESULTS: Pretreatment with candesartan and ramipril (low dose) did not reduce blood pressure during MCAO, whereas ramipril high dose did. Candesartan, but not ramipril at any dose, significantly reduced stroke volume and improved neurological outcome. Poststroke mRNA and protein of the neurotrophin receptor, TrkB, were significantly elevated in animals treated with candesartan, but not ramipril. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic pretreatment with a sub-hypotensive, RAS-blocking dose of candesartan affords neuroprotection after focal ischemia, associated with increased activity of the neurotrophin BDNF/TrkB system. Ramipril at sub-hypotensive and hypotensive, RAS-blocking doses showed no significant neuroprotective effects.
OBJECTIVES: Drugs interfering with the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) have been shown to reduce the incidence of stroke in patients at risk and to afford neuroprotection in experimental brain ischemia. This study aimed to compare potential neuroprotective effects of systemic pretreatment with the angiotensin receptor blocker, candesartan, and the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitor, ramipril, in normotensive Wistar rats after focal cerebral ischemia, with special emphasis on the regulation of neurotrophins. METHODS: Equipotent subcutaneous doses of candesartan and ramipril were determined via inhibition of pressor responses to intravenously injected angiotensin II (Ang II) or angiotensin I (Ang I), respectively. Accordingly, animals were treated with candesartan (0.1 mg/kg body weight, twice daily), ramipril (0.01 and 0.1 mg/kg body weight, twice daily) or vehicle (0.9% saline, twice daily), respectively, 5 days prior to middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) with reperfusion. Severity of stroke was estimated via infarct size [magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 48 h after MCAO] and neurological outcome (24 h, 48 h after MCAO). Measurements of neurotrophins/receptors in brain tissue were performed 48 h after MCAO. RESULTS: Pretreatment with candesartan and ramipril (low dose) did not reduce blood pressure during MCAO, whereas ramipril high dose did. Candesartan, but not ramipril at any dose, significantly reduced stroke volume and improved neurological outcome. Poststroke mRNA and protein of the neurotrophin receptor, TrkB, were significantly elevated in animals treated with candesartan, but not ramipril. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic pretreatment with a sub-hypotensive, RAS-blocking dose of candesartan affords neuroprotection after focal ischemia, associated with increased activity of the neurotrophin BDNF/TrkB system. Ramipril at sub-hypotensive and hypotensive, RAS-blocking doses showed no significant neuroprotective effects.
Authors: Claudia A McCarthy; Antony Vinh; Alyson A Miller; Anders Hallberg; Mathias Alterman; Jennifer K Callaway; Robert E Widdop Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-04-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Abdelrahman Y Fouda; Ahmed Alhusban; Tauheed Ishrat; Bindu Pillai; Wael Eldahshan; Jennifer L Waller; Adviye Ergul; Susan C Fagan Journal: Mol Neurobiol Date: 2016-01-12 Impact factor: 5.590
Authors: Kristin Schmerbach; Thiemo Pfab; Yi Zhao; Juraj Culman; Susanne Mueller; Arno Villringer; Dominik N Muller; Berthold Hocher; Thomas Unger; Christa Thoene-Reineke Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-11-29 Impact factor: 3.240