Literature DB >> 18300758

New insights into the pathogenesis and treatment of chronic myeloproliferative disorders.

Ruben A Mesa1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The classic BCR-ABL negative myeloproliferative disorders are at a crossroads of rapidly evolving pathogenetic understanding, leading to changes in diagnostic criteria and potentially targeted therapy. This review focuses on the implications of these changes relative to current standards. RECENT
FINDINGS: The V617F activating mutation of Janus kinase 2, and associated parallel mutations, is at least partially responsible for myeloproliferation (and potentially vascular events) associated with myeloproliferative disorders. It is unclear whether the mutation facilitates progression to the blast phases of myeloproliferative disorders.
SUMMARY: The high prevalence of the V617F mutation of Janus kinase 2 and associated mutations in myeloproliferative disorders (> 95% in polycythemia vera and about half of patients with essential thrombocythemia and primary myelofibrosis) has led the World Health Organization to alter the diagnostic criteria for these myeloproliferative disorders, and these changes are reviewed. Current therapy for myeloproliferative disorders remains largely based on preventing vascular events and symptomatic control, with allogeneic stem cell transplantation for high-risk patients. Investigational approaches to myeloproliferative disorders involve targeting the bone marrow microenvironment and DNA hypermethylation. Phase I clinical testing of inhibition of Janus kinase 2, active in vitro, began with several agents in 2007; the results are highly anticipated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18300758     DOI: 10.1097/MOH.0b013e3282f3debd

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Hematol        ISSN: 1065-6251            Impact factor:   3.284


  2 in total

Review 1.  Future therapies for the myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Authors:  Robyn Scherber; Ruben A Mesa
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 2.  Can literature analysis identify innovation drivers in drug discovery?

Authors:  Pankaj Agarwal; David B Searls
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 84.694

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.