Literature DB >> 18300313

Differences in electrical stimulation thresholds between men and women.

Nicola A Maffiuletti1, Azael J Herrero, Marc Jubeau, Franco M Impellizzeri, Mario Bizzini.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Surface electrical stimulation (ES) of skeletal muscle is used in a variety of clinical settings in healthy and unhealthy subjects of both sexes. Although women generally present larger amounts of subcutaneous adipose tissue than men, which could limit current flow to the stimulated muscle, sex-related differences in ES current levels have not been clearly demonstrated to date. We report data from healthy men and women.
METHODS: Sensory (current perception), motor (minimal knee extension torque production), and supramotor thresholds (10% of the maximal voluntary knee extension torque) and perceived pain during surface ES of the quadriceps femoris muscle were investigated in 40 healthy volunteers (20 men, 20 women).
RESULTS: Sensory threshold was lower in women than in men (-43%; p < 0.001). Similarly, female muscles required lower current amplitudes to attain the supramotor threshold (-17%; p < 0.01). The Visual Analogue Scale pain score was significantly greater in women than in men at motor threshold (+112%; p < 0.01) but not at supramotor threshold (+36%; p > 0.05).
INTERPRETATION: Collectively, our data demonstrate higher sensory and supramotor excitability to surface ES in female subjects and provide further evidence for a neurophysiological explanation for more pronounced pain perception in women. These observations may help clinicians to better understand the sex-specific response to ES and to design more rational stimulation treatments with the ultimate goal of optimizing patient care and safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18300313     DOI: 10.1002/ana.21346

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Neurol        ISSN: 0364-5134            Impact factor:   10.422


  25 in total

Review 1.  Physiological and methodological considerations for the use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Nicola A Maffiuletti
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Caution is required when comparing the effectiveness of voluntary versus stimulated versus combined strength training modalities.

Authors:  Nicola A Maffiuletti
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  In vivo and in vitro comparison of female and male nociceptors.

Authors:  Jan Hendrich; Pedro Alvarez; Elizabeth K Joseph; Luiz F Ferrari; Xiaojie Chen; Jon D Levine
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 5.820

4.  Long-term changes of stimulation intensities in hypoglossal nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Zhaojun Zhu; Benedikt Hofauer; Markus Wirth; Clemens Heiser
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 4.062

5.  Age, gender, and side differences of cutaneous electrical perceptual threshold testing in an able-bodied population.

Authors:  Grace Woon Su Leong; Jenny Lauschke; Susan B Rutowski; Phil M Waite
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.985

6.  Time-Dependent Discrepancies between Assessments of Sensory Function after Incomplete Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Richard A Macklin; Jihye Bae; Melanie Orell; Kim D Anderson; Peter H Ellaway; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 5.269

7.  Prediction of pain sensitivity in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Pernille Ravn; Rune Frederiksen; Anders P Skovsen; Lona L Christrup; Mads U Werner
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 3.133

8.  Impacts of selected stimulation patterns on the perception threshold in electrocutaneous stimulation.

Authors:  Bo Geng; Ken Yoshida; Winnie Jensen
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 4.262

9.  On the threshold - evaluation of variability in effects of acupuncture in a gender perspective.

Authors:  Iréne Lund; Thomas Lundeberg
Journal:  Chin Med       Date:  2010-09-04       Impact factor: 5.455

Review 10.  Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for preventing skeletal-muscle weakness and wasting in critically ill patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nicola A Maffiuletti; Marc Roig; Eleftherios Karatzanos; Serafim Nanas
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 8.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.