Literature DB >> 18299626

The UK postmortem organ retention crisis: a qualitative study of its impact on parents.

Magi Sque1, Tracy Long, Sheila Payne, William R Roche, Peter Speck.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the impact of postmortem organ retention on parents who made enquiries about their babies and children when the retention of hearts and other organs removed at postmortem and stored without explicit knowledge or consent of the next-of-kin came to public attention in the UK during 1999-2004.
DESIGN: Qualitative study conducted 2003-2004. Data were collected via semi-structured, qualitative interviews and focus groups. PARTICIPANTS: 39 parents who had been affected by organ retention.
SETTING: Participants were recruited via three parental peer support groups and two NHS Hospital Trusts.
RESULTS: Transcripts of the interviews and focus groups were analysed using a thematic approach that sought patterns within the data and highlighted important similarities and differences between participants' accounts. Participants reported the distressing impact organ retention had on their lives; their need for information about the retention of their babies' or children's organs; and the difficulties in their decision making about disposal of retained body parts and tissue blocks and slides. Analysis indicated that organ retention had evoked unresolved bereavement issues and a renewal of grief as well as an opportunity for some parents to resolve ongoing bereavement concerns.
CONCLUSIONS: Parents in this study wanted NHS teams to appreciate the difficulties organ retention had caused them, deal with their enquiries proactively with openness and honesty, and facilitate an environment where they felt supported and could gain the answers to their questions and concerns that were provoked by postmortem organ retention. Such issues may also have implications for the care of other parents and relatives of deceased children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18299626      PMCID: PMC2254458          DOI: 10.1258/jrsm.2007.060178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Med        ISSN: 0141-0768            Impact factor:   5.344


  8 in total

1.  The dual process model of coping with bereavement: rationale and description.

Authors:  M Stroebe; H Schut
Journal:  Death Stud       Date:  1999 Apr-May

2.  105,000 body parts retained in the UK, census says.

Authors:  S Ramsay
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-02-03       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  The art and science of clinical knowledge: evidence beyond measures and numbers.

Authors:  K Malterud
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-08-04       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines.

Authors:  K Malterud
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-08-11       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Stored human tissue: an ethical perspective on the fate of anonymous, archival material.

Authors:  D G Jones; R Gear; K A Galvin
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Obtaining consent for autopsy.

Authors:  Michael B McDermott
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-10-04

7.  Some questions of identity: late miscarriage, stillbirth and perinatal loss.

Authors:  A Lovell
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  They stole my baby's soul: narratives of embodiment and loss.

Authors:  A V Campbell; M Willis
Journal:  Med Humanit       Date:  2005-12
  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Posthumous Organ Retention and Use in Ghana: Regulating Individual, Familial and Societal Interests.

Authors:  Divine Ndonbi Banyubala
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2016-12

Review 2.  Supporting Adults Bereaved Through COVID-19: A Rapid Review of the Impact of Previous Pandemics on Grief and Bereavement.

Authors:  Catriona R Mayland; Andrew J E Harding; Nancy Preston; Sheila Payne
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.612

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.