Literature DB >> 18298706

Size and aggregation of corticosteroids used for epidural injections.

Richard Derby1, Sang-Heon Lee, Elaine S Date, Joo-Han Lee, Chang-Hyung Lee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to document particulate size in commonly used corticosteroid preparations. Inadvertent injection of particulate corticosteroids into a vertebral or foraminal artery can cause brain and spinal cord embolic infarcts and the size of the particles could be directly related to the chance that a clinically significant infarct would occur. One might assume that corticosteroids with particles significantly smaller than red blood cells might be safer.
DESIGN: The following four types of corticosteroid preparations were used in various solutions and evaluated under light microscopy: dexamethasone sodium phosphate injection, triamcinolone acetonide injectable suspension, betamethasone sodium phosphate and betamethasone acetate injectable suspension, and methylprednisolone acetate injectable suspension.
RESULTS: Dexamethasone sodium phosphate particle size was approximately 10 times smaller than red blood cells and the particles did not appear to aggregate; even mixed with 1% lidocaine HCl solution and with contrast dye, the size of the particles were unchanged. Triamcinolone acetonide and betamethasone sodium phosphate showed variable sizes; some particles were larger than red blood cells, and aggregation of particles was evident. Methylprednisolone acetate showed uniformity in size and the majority were smaller than red blood cells which were not aggregated, but the particles were densely packed.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the particulate steroid solutions, dexamethasone sodium phosphate had particles that were significantly smaller than red blood cells, had the least tendency to aggregation, and had the lowest density. These characteristics should significantly reduce the risk of embolic infarcts or prevent them from occurring after intra-arterial injection. Until shown otherwise in clinical studies, interventionalists might consider using dexamethasone or another corticosteroid preparation with similar high solubility and negligible particle size when performing epidural injections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18298706     DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2007.00341.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Med        ISSN: 1526-2375            Impact factor:   3.750


  41 in total

1.  Ultrasound-guided selective nerve root block versus fluoroscopy-guided interlaminar epidural block for the treatment of radicular pain in the lower cervical spine: a retrospective comparative study.

Authors:  Ki Deok Park; Woo Yong Lee; Sang Hyun Nam; Myounghwan Kim; Yongbum Park
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2018-12-05

Review 2.  Particulate versus non-particulate steroids for lumbar transforaminal or interlaminar epidural steroid injections: an update.

Authors:  Tobias J Dietrich; Reto Sutter; Johannes M Froehlich; Christian W A Pfirrmann
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  Epidural steroid injections.

Authors:  Indy M Wilkinson; Steven P Cohen
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2012-02

4.  Metabolic and endocrinal effects of epidural glucocorticoid injections.

Authors:  Anuntapon Chutatape; Mahesh Menon; Stephanie Man Chung Fook-Chong; Jane Mary George
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 1.858

5.  Relationship between bone mineral density and the frequent administration of epidural steroid injections in postmenopausal women with low back pain.

Authors:  Sungyun Kim; Byeongmun Hwang
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 3.037

6.  Safety of CT-Guided Lumbar Nerve Root Infiltrations. Analysis of a Two-Year Period.

Authors:  Johannes Gossner
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 1.610

7.  Ultrasound versus fluoroscopy-guided cervical medial branch block for the treatment of chronic cervical facet joint pain: a retrospective comparative study.

Authors:  Ki Deok Park; Dong-Ju Lim; Woo Yong Lee; JaeKi Ahn; Yongbum Park
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 8.  Steroids Spinal Injections.

Authors:  Stefano Marcia; Chiara Zini; Joshua A Hirsch; Ronil V Chandra; Matteo Bellini
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 1.513

9.  CT-Fluoroscopic Cervical Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections: Extraforaminal Needle Tip Position Decreases Risk of Intravascular Injection.

Authors:  G M Lagemann; M P Yannes; A Ghodadra; W E Rothfus; V Agarwal
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Complications and pitfalls of lumbar interlaminar and transforaminal epidural injections.

Authors:  Bradly S Goodman; Lyle W F Posecion; Srinivas Mallempati; Matt Bayazitoglu
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2008-08-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.