Literature DB >> 18298685

Intracluster correlation coefficients from the 2005 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health: implications for implementation research.

Monica Taljaard1, Allan Donner, José Villar, Daniel Wojdyla, Alejandro Velazco, Vicente Bataglia, Anibal Faundes, Ana Langer, Alberto Narváez, Eliette Valladares, Guillermo Carroli, Nelly Zavaleta, Archana Shah, Liana Campodónico, Mariana Romero, Sofia Reynoso, Karla Simônia de Pádua, Daniel Giordano, Marius Kublickas, Arnaldo Acosta.   

Abstract

Cluster-based studies involving aggregate units such as hospitals or medical practices are increasingly being used in healthcare evaluation. An important characteristic of such studies is the presence of intracluster correlation, typically quantified by the intracluster correlation coefficient (ICC). Sample size calculations for cluster-based studies need to account for the ICC, or risk underestimating the sample size required to yield the desired levels of power and significance. In this article, we present values for ICCs that were obtained from data on 97,095 pregnancies and 98,072 births taking place in a representative sample of 120 hospitals in eight Latin American countries. We present ICCs for 86 variables measured on mothers and newborns from pregnancy to the time of hospital discharge, including 'process variables' representing actual medical care received for each mother and newborn. Process variables are of primary interest in the field of implementation research. We found that overall, ICCs ranged from a minimum of 0.0003 to a maximum of 0.563 (median 0.067). For maternal and newborn outcome variables, the median ICCs were 0.011 (interquartile range 0.007-0.037) and 0.054 (interquartile range 0.013-0.075) respectively; however, for process variables, the median was 0.161 (interquartile range 0.072-0.328). Thus, we confirm previous findings that process variables tend to have higher ICCs than outcome variables. We demonstrate that ICCs generally tend to increase with higher prevalences (close to 0.5). These results can help researchers calculate the required sample size for future research studies in maternal and perinatal health.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18298685     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00901.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol        ISSN: 0269-5022            Impact factor:   3.980


  31 in total

Review 1.  Alternative versus standard packages of antenatal care for low-risk pregnancy.

Authors:  Therese Dowswell; Guillermo Carroli; Lelia Duley; Simon Gates; A Metin Gülmezoglu; Dina Khan-Neelofur; Gilda Gp Piaggio
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-10-06

2.  Cluster Effects in a National Dental PBRN restorative study.

Authors:  M S Litaker; V V Gordan; D B Rindal; J L Fellows; G H Gilbert
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 3.  Alternative versus standard packages of antenatal care for low-risk pregnancy.

Authors:  Therese Dowswell; Guillermo Carroli; Lelia Duley; Simon Gates; A Metin Gülmezoglu; Dina Khan-Neelofur; Gilda Piaggio
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-07-16

4.  Building Local Infrastructure for Community Adoption of Science-Based Prevention: The Role of Coalition Functioning.

Authors:  Valerie B Shapiro; J David Hawkins; Sabrina Oesterle
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2015-11

5.  Variation in child cognitive ability by week of gestation among healthy term births.

Authors:  Seungmi Yang; Robert W Platt; Michael S Kramer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Intraclass correlation coefficients typical of cluster-randomized studies: estimates from the Robert Wood Johnson Prescription for Health projects.

Authors:  David M Thompson; Douglas H Fernald; James W Mold
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

7.  Intraclass correlation coefficients in the Brazilian Network for Surveillance of Severe Maternal Morbidity study.

Authors:  Samira M Haddad; Maria H Sousa; Jose G Cecatti; Mary A Parpinelli; Maria L Costa; Joao P Souza
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Strengthening health human resources and improving clinical outcomes through an integrated guideline and educational outreach in resource-poor settings: a cluster-randomized trial.

Authors:  Michael J Schull; Hastings Banda; Damson Kathyola; Lara Fairall; Alexandra Martiniuk; Barry Burciul; Merrick Zwarenstein; Sumeet Sodhi; Sandy Thompson; Martias Joshua; Martha Mondiwa; Eric Bateman
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America: classifying caesarean sections.

Authors:  Ana P Betrán; A Metin Gulmezoglu; Michael Robson; Mario Merialdi; João P Souza; Daniel Wojdyla; Mariana Widmer; Guillermo Carroli; Maria R Torloni; Ana Langer; Alberto Narváez; Alejandro Velasco; Anibal Faúndes; Arnaldo Acosta; Eliette Valladares; Mariana Romero; Nelly Zavaleta; Sofia Reynoso; Vicente Bataglia
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 3.223

10.  QUARITE (quality of care, risk management and technology in obstetrics): a cluster-randomized trial of a multifaceted intervention to improve emergency obstetric care in Senegal and Mali.

Authors:  Alexandre Dumont; Pierre Fournier; William Fraser; Slim Haddad; Mamadou Traore; Idrissa Diop; Mouhamadou Gueye; Alioune Gaye; François Couturier; Jean-Charles Pasquier; François Beaudoin; André Lalonde; Marie Hatem; Michal Abrahamowicz
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.