Literature DB >> 18298428

The use of life-cycle assessment to evaluate the environmental impacts of growing genetically modified, nitrogen use-efficient canola.

Alison Strange1, Julian Park, Richard Bennett, Richard Phipps.   

Abstract

Agriculture, particularly intensive crop production, makes a significant contribution to environmental pollution. A variety of canola (Brassica napus) has been genetically modified to enhance nitrogen use efficiency, effectively reducing the amount of fertilizer required for crop production. A partial life-cycle assessment adapted to crop production was used to assess the potential environmental impacts of growing genetically modified, nitrogen use-efficient (GMNUE) canola in North Dakota and Minnesota compared with a conventionally bred control variety. The analysis took into account the entire production system used to produce 1 tonne of canola. This comprised raw material extraction, processing and transportation, as well as all agricultural field operations. All emissions associated with the production of 1 tonne of canola were listed, aggregated and weighted in order to calculate the level of environmental impact. The findings show that there are a range of potential environmental benefits associated with growing GMNUE canola. These include reduced impacts on global warming, freshwater ecotoxicity, eutrophication and acidification. Given the large areas of canola grown in North America and, in particular, Canada, as well as the wide acceptance of genetically modified varieties in this area, there is the potential for GMNUE canola to reduce pollution from agriculture, with the largest reductions predicted to be in greenhouse gases and diffuse water pollution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18298428     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2008.00323.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J        ISSN: 1467-7644            Impact factor:   9.803


  2 in total

1.  Potential of genetically modified oilseed rape for biofuels in Austria: Land use patterns and coexistence constraints could decrease domestic feedstock production.

Authors:  Dietmar Moser; Michael Eckerstorfer; Kathrin Pascher; Franz Essl; Klaus Peter Zulka
Journal:  Biomass Bioenergy       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.061

Review 2.  Conducting an agricultural life cycle assessment: challenges and perspectives.

Authors:  Kevin R Caffrey; Matthew W Veal
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-12-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.