Literature DB >> 18297583

Antipsychotics, glycemic disorders, and life-threatening diabetic events: a Bayesian data-mining analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system (1968-2004).

William DuMouchel1, David Fram, Xionghu Yang, Ramy A Mahmoud, Amy L Grogg, Luella Engelhart, Krishnan Ramaswamy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This analysis compared diabetes-related adverse events associated with use of different antipsychotic agents. A disproportionality analysis of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS) was performed.
METHODS: Data from the FDA postmarketing AERS database (1968 through first quarter 2004) were evaluated. Drugs studied included aripiprazole, clozapine, haloperidol, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone. Fourteen Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Primary Terms (MPTs) were chosen to identify diabetes-related adverse events; 3 groupings into higher-level descriptive categories were also studied. Three methods of measuring drug-event associations were used: proportional reporting ratio, the empirical Bayes data-mining algorithm known as the Multi-Item Gamma Poisson Shrinker, and logistic regression (LR) analysis. Quantitative measures of association strength, with corresponding confidence intervals, between drugs and specified adverse events were computed and graphed. Some of the LR analyses were repeated separately for reports from patients under and over 45 years of age. Differences in association strength were declared statistically significant if the corresponding 90% confidence intervals did not overlap.
RESULTS: Association with various glycemic events differed for different drugs. On average, the rankings of association strength agreed with the following ordering: low association, ziprasidone, aripiprazole, haloperidol, and risperidone; medium association, quetiapine; and strong association, clozapine and olanzapine. The median rank correlation between the above ordering and the 17 sets of LR coefficients (1 set for each glycemic event) was 93%. Many of the disproportionality measures were significantly different across drugs, and ratios of disproportionality factors of 5 or more were frequently observed.
CONCLUSIONS: There are consistent and substantial differences between atypical antipsychotic drugs in the disproportionality reporting ratios relating to glycemic effects, especially life-threatening events, in the AERS database. The relative associational rankings of drugs are similar in reports from younger and older patients. These results agree with several other reports in the literature, do not support a "class effect" hypothesis, and provide a strong rationale for further studies to clarify the issue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18297583     DOI: 10.1080/10401230701844612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Clin Psychiatry        ISSN: 1040-1237            Impact factor:   1.567


  13 in total

Review 1.  Data-mining technologies for diabetes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Miroslav Marinov; Abu Saleh Mohammad Mosa; Illhoi Yoo; Suzanne Austin Boren
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-11-01

2.  Temporal data mining for the assessment of the costs related to diabetes mellitus pharmacological treatment.

Authors:  Stefano Concaro; Lucia Sacchi; Carlo Cerra; Mario Stefanelli; Pietro Fratino; Riccardo Bellazzi
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2009-11-14

3.  A Comparison Study of Algorithms to Detect Drug-Adverse Event Associations: Frequentist, Bayesian, and Machine-Learning Approaches.

Authors:  Minh Pham; Feng Cheng; Kandethody Ramachandran
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Real-world risk of diabetes with antipsychotic use in older New Zealanders: a case-crossover study.

Authors:  Prasad S Nishtala; Te-Yuan Chyou
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 5.  A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal of Economic Evaluations of Pharmacological Interventions for People with Bipolar Disorder.

Authors:  Ifigeneia Mavranezouli; Joran Lokkerbol
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  A 52-week, double-blind evaluation of the metabolic effects of aripiprazole and lithium in bipolar I disorder.

Authors:  Roger S McIntyre; Susan L McElroy; James M Eudicone; Robert A Forbes; Berit X Carlson; Ross A Baker
Journal:  Prim Care Companion CNS Disord       Date:  2011

Review 7.  A plea for a more epidemiological and patient-oriented pharmacovigilance.

Authors:  Veronica Scurti; Marilena Romero; Gianni Tognoni
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 8.  Assessing cardiovascular drug safety for clinical decision-making.

Authors:  Raymond L Woosley; Klaus Romero
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 32.419

9.  Predictors of type 2 diabetes in a nationally representative sample of adults with psychosis.

Authors:  Debra L Foley; Andrew Mackinnon; Vera A Morgan; Gerald F Watts; John J McGrath; David J Castle; Anna Waterreus; Cherrie A Galletly
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 49.548

10.  Evaluation of disproportionality safety signaling applied to healthcare databases.

Authors:  William DuMouchel; Patrick B Ryan; Martijn J Schuemie; David Madigan
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.606

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.