Literature DB >> 18297396

Predicting features of breast cancer with gene expression patterns.

Xuesong Lu1, Xin Lu, Zhigang C Wang, J Dirk Iglehart, Xuegong Zhang, Andrea L Richardson.   

Abstract

Data from gene expression arrays hold an enormous amount of biological information. We sought to determine if global gene expression in primary breast cancers contained information about biologic, histologic, and anatomic features of the disease in individual patients. Microarray data from the tumors of 129 patients were analyzed for the ability to predict biomarkers [estrogen receptor (ER) and HER2], histologic features [grade and lymphatic-vascular invasion (LVI)], and stage parameters (tumor size and lymph node metastasis). Multiple statistical predictors were used and the prediction accuracy was determined by cross-validation error rate; multidimensional scaling (MDS) allowed visualization of the predicted states under study. Models built from gene expression data accurately predict ER and HER2 status, and divide tumor grade into high-grade and low-grade clusters; intermediate-grade tumors are not a unique group. In contrast, gene expression data is inaccurate at predicting tumor size, lymph node status or LVI. The best model for prediction of nodal status included tumor size, LVI status and pathologically defined tumor subtype (based on combinations of ER, HER2, and grade); the addition of microarray-based prediction to this model failed to improve the prediction accuracy. Global gene expression supports a binary division of ER, HER2, and grade, clearly separating tumors into two categories; intermediate values for these bio-indicators do not define intermediate tumor subsets. Results are consistent with a model of regional metastasis that depends on inherent biologic differences in metastatic propensity between breast cancer subtypes, upon which time and chance then operate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18297396     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-007-9596-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  115 in total

1.  Improving biomarker list stability by integration of biological knowledge in the learning process.

Authors:  Tiziana Sanavia; Fabio Aiolli; Giovanni Da San Martino; Andrea Bisognin; Barbara Di Camillo
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Engagement of I-branching {beta}-1, 6-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase 2 in breast cancer metastasis and TGF-{beta} signaling.

Authors:  Haijun Zhang; Fanyan Meng; Sherwin Wu; Bas Kreike; Seema Sethi; Wei Chen; Fred R Miller; Guojun Wu
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Lymphovascular invasion in breast cancer is associated with gene expression signatures of cell proliferation but not lymphangiogenesis or immune response.

Authors:  Mariko Asaoka; Santosh K Patnaik; Frank Zhang; Takashi Ishikawa; Kazuaki Takabe
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Using Frequent Co-expression Network to Identify Gene Clusters for Breast Cancer Prognosis.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Kun Huang; Yang Xiang; Ruoming Jin
Journal:  Proc Int Joint Conf Bioinforma Syst Biol Intell Comput       Date:  2009-08-03

5.  The transcription factor REST is lost in aggressive breast cancer.

Authors:  Matthew P Wagoner; Kearney T W Gunsalus; Barry Schoenike; Andrea L Richardson; Andreas Friedl; Avtar Roopra
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 5.917

6.  Minimising immunohistochemical false negative ER classification using a complementary 23 gene expression signature of ER status.

Authors:  Qiyuan Li; Aron C Eklund; Nicolai Juul; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Christopher T Workman; Andrea L Richardson; Zoltan Szallasi; Charles Swanton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  PTK6 regulates IGF-1-induced anchorage-independent survival.

Authors:  Hanna Y Irie; Yashaswi Shrestha; Laura M Selfors; Fabianne Frye; Naoko Iida; Zhigang Wang; Lihua Zou; Jun Yao; Yiling Lu; Charles B Epstein; Sridaran Natesan; Andrea L Richardson; Kornelia Polyak; Gordon B Mills; William C Hahn; Joan S Brugge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Metastatic canine mammary carcinomas can be identified by a gene expression profile that partly overlaps with human breast cancer profiles.

Authors:  Robert Klopfleisch; Dido Lenze; Michael Hummel; Achim D Gruber
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Amplification of LAPTM4B and YWHAZ contributes to chemotherapy resistance and recurrence of breast cancer.

Authors:  Yang Li; Lihua Zou; Qiyuan Li; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Ruiyang Tian; Yan Li; Christine Desmedt; Christos Sotiriou; Zoltan Szallasi; J Dirk Iglehart; Andrea L Richardson; Zhigang Charles Wang
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2010-01-24       Impact factor: 53.440

10.  Correlating measurements across samples improves accuracy of large-scale expression profile experiments.

Authors:  Mariano Javier Alvarez; Pavel Sumazin; Presha Rajbhandari; Andrea Califano
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 13.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.