PURPOSE: Overexpression of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) occurs with high incidence in various carcinomas. The oncogenic expression of the receptor has been exploited for immunoglobulin-based diagnostics and therapeutics. We describe the use of a llama single-domain antibody fragment, termed Nanobody, for the in vivo radioimmunodetection of EGFR overexpressing tumors using single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in mice. METHODS: Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis was performed to evaluate the specificity and selectivity of 8B6 Nanobody to bind EGFR on EGFR overexpressing cells. The Nanobody was then labeled with (99m)Tc via its C-terminal histidine tail. Uptake in normal organs and tissues was assessed by ex vivo analysis. In vivo tumor targeting of (99m)Tc-8B6 Nanobody was evaluated via pinhole SPECT in mice bearing xenografts of tumor cells with either high (A431) or moderate (DU145) overexpression of EGFR. RESULTS: FACS analysis indicated that the 8B6 Nanobody only recognizes cells overexpressing EGFR. In vivo blood clearance of (99m)Tc-8B6 Nanobody is relatively fast (half-life, 1.5 h) and mainly via the kidneys. At 3 h postinjection, total kidney accumulation is high (46.6+/-0.9%IA) compared to total liver uptake (18.9+/-0.6%IA). Pinhole SPECT imaging of mice bearing A431 xenografts showed higher average tumor uptake (5.2+/-0.5%IA/cm(3)) of (99m)Tc-8B6 Nanobody compared to DU145 xenografts (1.8+/-0.3%IA/cm(3), p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The EGFR-binding Nanobody investigated in this study shows high specificity and selectivity towards EGFR overexpressing cells. Pinhole SPECT analysis with (99m)Tc-8B6 Nanobody enabled in vivo discrimination between tumors with high and moderate EGFR overexpression. The favorable biodistribution further corroborates the suitability of Nanobodies for in vivo tumor imaging.
PURPOSE: Overexpression of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) occurs with high incidence in various carcinomas. The oncogenic expression of the receptor has been exploited for immunoglobulin-based diagnostics and therapeutics. We describe the use of a llama single-domain antibody fragment, termed Nanobody, for the in vivo radioimmunodetection of EGFR overexpressing tumors using single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in mice. METHODS: Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis was performed to evaluate the specificity and selectivity of 8B6 Nanobody to bind EGFR on EGFR overexpressing cells. The Nanobody was then labeled with (99m)Tc via its C-terminal histidine tail. Uptake in normal organs and tissues was assessed by ex vivo analysis. In vivo tumor targeting of (99m)Tc-8B6 Nanobody was evaluated via pinhole SPECT in mice bearing xenografts of tumor cells with either high (A431) or moderate (DU145) overexpression of EGFR. RESULTS: FACS analysis indicated that the 8B6 Nanobody only recognizes cells overexpressing EGFR. In vivo blood clearance of (99m)Tc-8B6 Nanobody is relatively fast (half-life, 1.5 h) and mainly via the kidneys. At 3 h postinjection, total kidney accumulation is high (46.6+/-0.9%IA) compared to total liver uptake (18.9+/-0.6%IA). Pinhole SPECT imaging of mice bearing A431 xenografts showed higher average tumor uptake (5.2+/-0.5%IA/cm(3)) of (99m)Tc-8B6 Nanobody compared to DU145 xenografts (1.8+/-0.3%IA/cm(3), p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The EGFR-binding Nanobody investigated in this study shows high specificity and selectivity towards EGFR overexpressing cells. Pinhole SPECT analysis with (99m)Tc-8B6 Nanobody enabled in vivo discrimination between tumors with high and moderate EGFR overexpression. The favorable biodistribution further corroborates the suitability of Nanobodies for in vivo tumor imaging.
Authors: A M Honegger; T J Dull; S Felder; E Van Obberghen; F Bellot; D Szapary; A Schmidt; A Ullrich; J Schlessinger Journal: Cell Date: 1987-10-23 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Z Aguilar; R W Akita; R S Finn; B L Ramos; M D Pegram; F F Kabbinavar; R J Pietras; P Pisacane; M X Sliwkowski; D J Slamon Journal: Oncogene Date: 1999-10-28 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Lars R Perk; Gerard W M Visser; Maria J W D Vosjan; Marijke Stigter-van Walsum; Bernard M Tijink; C René Leemans; Guus A M S van Dongen Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Anna Orlova; Mikaela Magnusson; Tove L J Eriksson; Martin Nilsson; Barbro Larsson; Ingmarie Höidén-Guthenberg; Charles Widström; Jörgen Carlsson; Vladimir Tolmachev; Stefan Ståhl; Fredrik Y Nilsson Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2006-04-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: M Friedman; E Nordberg; I Höidén-Guthenberg; H Brismar; G P Adams; F Y Nilsson; J Carlsson; S Ståhl Journal: Protein Eng Des Sel Date: 2007-04-23 Impact factor: 1.650
Authors: David Maussang; Azra Mujić-Delić; Francis J Descamps; Catelijne Stortelers; Peter Vanlandschoot; Marijke Stigter-van Walsum; Henry F Vischer; Maarten van Roy; Maria Vosjan; Maria Gonzalez-Pajuelo; Guus A M S van Dongen; Pascal Merchiers; Philippe van Rompaey; Martine J Smit Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2013-08-26 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: G Caljon; V Caveliers; T Lahoutte; B Stijlemans; G H Ghassabeh; J Van Den Abbeele; I Smolders; P De Baetselier; Y Michotte; S Muyldermans; S Magez; R Clinckers Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Max A Kruziki; Brett A Case; Jie Y Chan; Elizabeth J Zudock; Daniel R Woldring; Douglas Yee; Benjamin J Hackel Journal: Mol Pharm Date: 2016-10-10 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Marek Pruszynski; Eftychia Koumarianou; Ganesan Vaidyanathan; Hilde Revets; Nick Devoogdt; Tony Lahoutte; Michael R Zalutsky Journal: Nucl Med Biol Date: 2012-11-15 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: Janusz Wesolowski; Vanina Alzogaray; Jan Reyelt; Mandy Unger; Karla Juarez; Mariela Urrutia; Ana Cauerhff; Welbeck Danquah; Björn Rissiek; Felix Scheuplein; Nicole Schwarz; Sahil Adriouch; Olivier Boyer; Michel Seman; Alexei Licea; David V Serreze; Fernando A Goldbaum; Friedrich Haag; Friedrich Koch-Nolte Journal: Med Microbiol Immunol Date: 2009-06-16 Impact factor: 3.402