Literature DB >> 18297312

Drifting plankton from a reservoir subsidize downstream food webs and alter community structure.

Hideyuki Doi1, Kwang-Hyeon Chang, Takamitsu Ando, Hiroyuki Imai, Shin-ichi Nakano, Akio Kajimoto, Izumi Katano.   

Abstract

Subsidy between ecosystems has been considered in many natural ecosystems, and should alter food webs and communities in human-impacted ones. We estimated how drifting plankton from a reservoir contribute to downstream food webs and showed that they alter community structures over a 10-km reach below the dam. To estimate the contribution of the drifting plankton to macroinvertebrates, we used C and N isotopes and an IsoSource mixing model. In spring and autumn, contributions of plankton to collector-filterer species were highest 0.2 km downstream of the dam, and clearly decreased from 0.2 to 10 km. At 0.2 km, the contribution of plankton to a predator stonefly was remarkably high. These results indicated that drifting plankton from a dam reservoir could subsidize downstream food webs and alter their energy base, but the importance of this subsidy decreased as distance from the reservoir increased. The general linear models indicated that the abundance of collector-filterers and predators was related positively to zooplankton density in stream water. Thus, food source alteration by drifting plankton also influenced the community structures downstream of the dam.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18297312     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-008-0988-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  6 in total

1.  Reciprocal subsidies: dynamic interdependence between terrestrial and aquatic food webs.

Authors:  S Nakano; M Murakami
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-01-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Source partitioning using stable isotopes: coping with too many sources.

Authors:  Donald L Phillips; Jillian W Gregg
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-05-21       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Fragmentation and flow regulation of the world's large river systems.

Authors:  Christer Nilsson; Catherine A Reidy; Mats Dynesius; Carmen Revenga
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Significance of instream autotrophs in trophic dynamics of the Upper Mississippi River.

Authors:  Michael D Delong; James H Thorp
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-09-17       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Habitat specialization and the exploitation of allochthonous carbon by zooplankton.

Authors:  Blake Matthews; Asit Mazumder
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.499

6.  Mixing models in analyses of diet using multiple stable isotopes: a critique.

Authors:  Donald L Phillips
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2001-01-10       Impact factor: 3.225

  6 in total
  4 in total

1.  Subsidies to predators, apparent competition and the phylogenetic structure of prey communities.

Authors:  Matthew R Helmus; Norman Mercado-Silva; M Jake Vander Zanden
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Macroinvertebrate communities and the relationships with biotic factors in river-connected lakes in the lower reaches of Yangtze River, China.

Authors:  Shiyun Chi; Jinxiu Zheng; Xianfu Zhao; Fangyong Dong; Juxiang Hu
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  The Impact of Land Use Transformations on Zooplankton Communities in a Small Mountain River (The Corgo River, Northern Portugal).

Authors:  Łukasz Sługocki; Robert Czerniawski; Monika Kowalska-Góralska; Magdalena Senze; Anabela Reis; João S Carrola; Carlos A Teixeira
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Spatial changes in zooplankton communities in a strong human-mediated river ecosystem.

Authors:  Robert Czerniawski; Monika Kowalska-Góralska
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 2.984

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.