Literature DB >> 18297267

Pharmacokinetics of meropenem during intermittent and continuous intravenous application in patients treated by continuous renal replacement therapy.

Julia Langgartner1, Antje Vasold, Thomas Glück, Michel Reng, Frieder Kees.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The clinical effect of beta-lactam antibiotics depends on the time of drug concentration above the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) for a susceptible bacterium. Continuous infusion (CI) of beta-lactams such as meropenem may therefore be a more rational approach than intermittent bolus injections (IB). The aim of this study was to test whether CI of meropenem achieves effective drug concentrations comparable to IB in patients treated by continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT).
DESIGN: Prospective, randomised cross-over study.
SETTING: Twelve-bed medical intensive care unit (ICU). PATIENTS AND
INTERVENTIONS: Six ICU patients were randomised to receive either meropenem 1 g IB every 12 h or a 0.5 g i.v. loading dose followed by 2 g i.v. CI over 24 h. After 2 days, regimens were crossed over. Meropenem pharmacokinetics were determined on days 2 and 4. MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: Peak serum concentration [median (25% and 75% quartiles)] after short infusion of 1 g meropenem were 62.8 (51.4; 85.0) mg/l, trough levels at 12 h were 8.1 (4.5; 18.7) mg/l, and serum half-life was 5.3 (5.1; 7.0) h. Steady-state concentrations during CI were 18.6 (13.3; 24.5) mg/l. The AUCs during either treatment were comparable and determined as 233 (202; 254) mg/l*h (IB) and 227 (182; 283) mg/l*h (CI), respectively. Four hours after IB, drug concentrations dropped below CI steady-state concentrations.
CONCLUSION: Appropriate antibacterial concentrations of meropenem in patients with CRRT are easily achievable with CI. CI may be an effective alternative dosing regimen to IB. A prospective comparison of the clinical efficacy of the two dosage regimens is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18297267     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-008-1034-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  24 in total

1.  Stability of meropenem in intravenous solutions.

Authors:  P R Patel; S E Cook
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  1997-02-15       Impact factor: 2.637

2.  High-performance liquid chromatographic assay for meropenem in serum.

Authors:  H Elkhaïli; S Niedergang; D Pompei; L Linger; D Leveque; F Jehl
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Biomed Appl       Date:  1996-11-08

3.  Continuous infusion versus intermittent administration of meropenem in critically ill patients.

Authors:  F Thalhammer; F Traunmüller; I El Menyawi; M Frass; U M Hollenstein; G J Locker; B Stoiser; T Staudinger; R Thalhammer-Scherrer; H Burgmann
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 4.  Killing and regrowth of bacteria in vitro: a review.

Authors:  W A Craig; S C Ebert
Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis Suppl       Date:  1990

5.  Elimination of meropenem during continuous veno-venous haemofiltration and haemodiafiltration in patients with acute renal failure.

Authors:  M Valtonen; E Tiula; J T Backman; P J Neuvonen
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Pharmacokinetics of meropenem in intensive care unit patients receiving continuous veno-venous hemofiltration or hemodiafiltration.

Authors:  L J Giles; A C Jennings; A H Thomson; G Creed; R J Beale; A McLuckie
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Derivation of meropenem dosage in patients receiving continuous veno-venous hemofiltration based on pharmacodynamic target attainment.

Authors:  Joseph L Kuti; David P Nicolau
Journal:  Chemotherapy       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 2.544

8.  The stability of a novel carbapenem antibiotic, meropenem (SM-7338), in a solid state formulation for injection.

Authors:  Y Takeuchi; Y Takebayashi; M Sunagawa; Y Isobe; Y Hamazume; A Uemura; T Noguchi
Journal:  Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo)       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 1.645

9.  Stability of meropenem in normal saline solution after storage at room temperature.

Authors:  Sutep Jaruratanasirikul; Somchai Sriwiriyajan
Journal:  Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 0.267

10.  Kinetics of antimicrobial activity.

Authors:  B Vogelman; W A Craig
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 4.406

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Blood purification and mortality in sepsis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Feihu Zhou; Zhiyong Peng; Raghavan Murugan; John A Kellum
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 2.  A Guide to Understanding Antimicrobial Drug Dosing in Critically Ill Patients on Renal Replacement Therapy.

Authors:  Valentina Pistolesi; Santo Morabito; Francesca Di Mario; Giuseppe Regolisti; Chiara Cantarelli; Enrico Fiaccadori
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Dosing nomograms for attaining optimum concentrations of meropenem by continuous infusion in critically ill patients with severe gram-negative infections: a pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics-based approach.

Authors:  Federico Pea; Pierluigi Viale; Piergiorgio Cojutti; Mario Furlanut
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Antibiotic dosing in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Rachel F Eyler; Bruce A Mueller
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 28.314

5.  Influence of continuous venovenous hemofiltration and continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration on the disposition of doripenem.

Authors:  Iolanda Cirillo; Nicole Vaccaro; Dainius Balis; Rebecca Redman; Gary R Matzke
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-01-03       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Meropenem population pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients with septic shock and continuous renal replacement therapy: influence of residual diuresis on dose requirements.

Authors:  Marta Ulldemolins; Dolors Soy; Mireia Llaurado-Serra; Sergi Vaquer; Pedro Castro; Alejandro H Rodríguez; Caridad Pontes; Gonzalo Calvo; Antoni Torres; Ignacio Martín-Loeches
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Poor Correlation between Meropenem and Piperacillin Plasma Concentrations and Delivered Dose of Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy.

Authors:  J Petersson; C G Giske; E Eliasson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Population Pharmacokinetics of Piperacillin following Continuous Infusion in Critically Ill Patients and Impact of Renal Function on Target Attainment.

Authors:  Vibeke Klastrup; Anders Thorsted; Merete Storgaard; Steffen Christensen; Lena E Friberg; Kristina Öbrink-Hansen
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Antibody-modified conduits for highly selective cytokine elimination from blood.

Authors:  J Brian McAlvin; Ryan G Wylie; Krithika Ramchander; Minh T Nguyen; Charles K Lok; Morgan Moroi; Andre Shomorony; Nikolay V Vasilyev; Patrick Armstrong; Jason Yang; Alexander M Lieber; Obiajulu S Okonkwo; Rohit Karnik; Daniel S Kohane
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2018-07-12

10.  Plasma and Lung Tissue Pharmacokinetics of Ceftaroline Fosamil in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery with Cardiopulmonary Bypass: an In Vivo Microdialysis Study.

Authors:  M Edlinger-Stanger; V Al Jalali; M Andreas; W Jäger; M Böhmdorfer; M Zeitlinger; D Hutschala
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.