Literature DB >> 18296928

Measuring low vision service outcomes: Rasch analysis of the seven-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire.

Barbara Ryan1, Helen Court, Tom H Margrain.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe a short, functional visual disability instrument capable of measuring the outcomes of a government funded country-wide multicenter low vision service in Wales and to determine if postal implementation might lead to response bias.
METHODS: Seven items from the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ), which have previously been shown to be responsive to low vision service intervention, were incorporated into a postal questionnaire which was given to patients before they attended the all Wales Low Vision Service. Rasch analysis was used to describe the instrument's psychometric properties.
RESULTS: Rasch analysis of 490 completed questionnaires showed that all seven questions worked together to form a unidimensional scale. By combining the first two response categories, category utilization and targeting was improved. There were no significant differences in the age (p = 0.29), gender (p = 0.75), distance binocular Visual Acuity (VA; p = 0.86), living situation (p = 0.34) or prevalence of macular degeneration (p = 0.31) between those who returned a completed questionnaire and those who did not.
CONCLUSIONS: The seven-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire is an appropriate and precise outcome measure that is acceptable to patients and easy to administer. It measures aspects of near, reading, and distance visual disability that have been shown to be amenable to low vision service provision and, therefore, it should be highly responsive to this intervention and facilitate inter-service assessment. We found no evidence to suggest that postal implementation results in response bias. The instrument is an appropriate measure of patient based outcomes for a large-scale, multicenter low vision service.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18296928     DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31816225dc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of scoring approaches for the NEI VFQ-25 in low vision.

Authors:  Bradley E Dougherty; Mark A Bullimore
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  An enhanced functional ability questionnaire (faVIQ) to measure the impact of rehabilitation services on the visually impaired.

Authors:  James Stuart Wolffsohn; Jonathan Jackson; Olivia Anne Hunt; Charles Cottriall; Jennifer Lindsay; Richard Gilmour; Anne Sinclair; Robert Harper
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Psychological and cognitive determinants of vision function in age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Barry W Rovner; Robin J Casten; Robert W Massof; Benjamin E Leiby; William S Tasman
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-07

4.  Interpretation of low-vision rehabilitation outcome measures.

Authors:  Robert W Massof; Joan A Stelmack
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  The Depression in Visual Impairment Trial (DEPVIT): trial design and protocol.

Authors:  Tom H Margrain; Claire Nollett; Julia Shearn; Miles Stanford; Rhiannon Tudor Edwards; Barbara Ryan; Catey Bunce; Robin Casten; Mark T Hegel; Daniel J Smith
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 3.630

6.  Low vision, visual impairments and metropolitan urban planning: example of a topographic enhancement, need and monitoring in an Italian city.

Authors:  Raffaele Nuzzi; Eleonora Bottacchi; Francesca Monteu
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-10-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.