Literature DB >> 18296015

Device-specific aneurysm sac morphology after endovascular aneurysm repair: evaluation of contemporary graft materials.

Harshal S Broker1, Kousta I Foteh, Erin H Murphy, Charles M Davis, G Patrick Clagett, J Gregory Modrall, Clifford J Buckley, Frank R Arko.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study analyzed device-specific aneurysm sac morphology after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with low-permeability devices.
METHODS: Between September 2004 and May 2006, 122 patients were treated with EVAR. Three different devices were implanted: 47 Zenith (Cook, Indianapolis, Ind), 46 AneuRx (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, Calif) with Resilient Dacron Graft Material, and 29 Excluder (W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz) with low-porosity polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). Patients were followed up at 1, 6, and 12 months and then biannually with computed tomography (CT) angiography. Standard axial two-dimensional CT measurements were obtained and compared with preoperative imaging. The preoperative scan served as a baseline, and the minor axis diameter, measured at the largest axial cut of the abdominal aortic aneurysm, was compared with the same measurement at follow-up.
RESULTS: Patient age, sex, and preoperative aneurysm morphology were similar among groups. Patients receiving the Zenith endograft had a significantly larger neck diameter; however, there was no difference in the neck length between groups. The rate of type II endoleaks was similar for the Zenith (17%), AneuRx (17%), and Excluder (14%). At 1, 6, 12, and 18 months, all three grafts were associated with sac shrinkage. The resulting decreases in mean aneurysm size at 18 months and corresponding shrinkage were Zenith, 11%, 6.4 +/- 1.8 mm; AneuRx, 18.9%, 12.7 +/- 2.7 mm; and the Excluder, 5.5%, 3.3 +/- 0.9 (P < .05). The sac size in the 19 patients with a type II endoleak decreased 8.06% compared with a 15.43% decrease in sac size in patients without endoleak at 6 months. No significant sac expansion > or =5 mm has been observed among any of the groups to date.
CONCLUSIONS: Sac regression with all devices appears to have been favorably influenced by the new generation of graft materials and is improved compared with published reports of older generation graft materials for the AneuRx and Excluder. However, there is a trend toward greater sac regression with devices using Dacron vs PTFE. The relationship of aneurysm morphology and long-term effects on aortic stent grafts is yet to be determined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18296015     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.11.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  7 in total

1.  The Endurant Stent Graft System: 15-month follow-up report in patients with challenging abdominal aortic anatomies.

Authors:  Alexander Hyhlik-Dürr; Tim F Weber; Drossos Kotelis; Fabian Rengier; Johannes Gahlen; Stefanie Böck; Jürgen Köhler; Christoph-M Ratusinski; Dittmar Böckler
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Predictors and Consequences of Sac Shrinkage after Endovascular Infrarenal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

Authors:  Sébastien Michel Vedani; Séverine Petitprez; Eva Weinz; Jean-Marc Corpataux; Sébastien Déglise; Céline Deslarzes-Dubuis; Elisabeth Côté; Jean-Baptiste Ricco; François Saucy
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Midterm outcomes of endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms with the on-label use compared with the off-label use of an endoprosthesis.

Authors:  Takuya Matsumoto; Shinichi Tanaka; Jun Okadome; Ryoichi Kyuragi; Ryota Fukunaga; Eisuke Kawakubo; Hiroyuki Itoh; Jin Okazaki; Ken Shirabe; Atsushi Fukuda; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Comparison of Endovascular Stent Grafts for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Medicare Beneficiaries.

Authors:  Dominique B Buck; Peter A Soden; Sarah E Deery; Sara L Zettervall; Klaas H J Ultee; Bruce E Landon; A James O'Malley; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 1.466

5.  Technical and clinical outcome of Talent versus Endurant endografts for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Birger Mensel; Jens-Peter Kühn; Tobias Träger; Martin Dührkoop; Wolfram von Bernstorff; Christian Rosenberg; Andreas Hoene; Ralf Puls
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effect of stent graft fixation types on pararenal aortic diameter and renal function after endovascular aortic repair.

Authors:  Choi Sangtae; Lee Wonsuk; Kang Jinmo; Kim Doojin; Ko Daisik
Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 0.332

7.  Assessing volumetric changes in abdominal aortic aneurysms following endovascular repair.

Authors:  Yalçın Gunerhan; Mehmet Isik; Yüksel Dereli; Omer Tanyeli; Cengiz Kadıyoran; Mehmet Sinan Iyisoy; Niyazi Gormus
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 1.167

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.