Literature DB >> 18295816

Effects of attention shifts to stationary objects during steady-state smooth pursuit eye movements.

Dirk Kerzel1, David Souto, Nathalie E Ziegler.   

Abstract

A number of studies have shown that stationary backgrounds compromise smooth pursuit eye movements. It has been suggested that poor attentional selection of the pursuit target was responsible for reductions of pursuit gain. To quantify the detrimental effects of attention, we instructed observers to either pay attention to background objects or to ignore them. The to-be-attended object was indicated by peripheral or central cues. Strong reductions of pursuit gain occurred when the following conditions were met: (a) the subject payed attention to the object (b) a salient event was present, for instance the onset of the target or cue and (c) the attended target produced retinal motion. Removing any of the three conditions resulted in no or far smaller decreases of pursuit gain. Further, decreases in pursuit gain were present with perceptual discrimination and simple manual detection.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18295816     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.01.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  15 in total

1.  Involuntary cueing effects during smooth pursuit: facilitation and inhibition of return in oculocentric coordinates.

Authors:  David Souto; Dirk Kerzel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-09-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Allocation of attention during pursuit of large objects is no different than during fixation.

Authors:  Scott N J Watamaniuk; Stephen J Heinen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Motion integration for ocular pursuit does not hinder perceptual segregation of moving objects.

Authors:  Zhenlan Jin; Scott N J Watamaniuk; Aarlenne Z Khan; Elena Potapchuk; Stephen J Heinen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Dissociation of pursuit target selection from saccade execution.

Authors:  Richard J Krauzlis; Natalie Dill; Garth A Fowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Flexibility of foveal attention during ocular pursuit.

Authors:  Stephen J Heinen; Zhenlan Jin; Scott N J Watamaniuk
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Tradeoff between manual response speed and pursuit accuracy revealed by a deadline procedure.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Seya; Shuji Mori
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Spatial allocation of attention during smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Lee P Lovejoy; Garth A Fowler; Richard J Krauzlis
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Asymmetric saccade reaction times to smooth pursuit.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Bieg; Lewis L Chuang; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Jean-Pierre Bresciani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Cognitive processes involved in smooth pursuit eye movements: behavioral evidence, neural substrate and clinical correlation.

Authors:  Kikuro Fukushima; Junko Fukushima; Tateo Warabi; Graham R Barnes
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-19

10.  Anticipatory smooth eye movements in autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Cordelia D Aitkin; Elio M Santos; Eileen Kowler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.