Literature DB >> 18295440

Incidence, risk factors, and treatment patterns for deep venous thrombosis in hospitalized children: an increasing population at risk.

John A Sandoval1, Michael P Sheehan, Charles E Stonerock, Shoaib Shafique, Frederick J Rescorla, Michael C Dalsing.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The optimal prophylactic strategy and treatment regimen for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in hospitalized pediatric patients is not clearly established. This study assessed the incidence, risk factors, and treatment patterns for DVT among pediatric patients admitted to a hospital ward.
METHODS: Children (aged <17 years) admitted to a single tertiary-care hospital during a 14-year period who developed or presented with DVT were retrospectively identified. Patient demographic and clinical data were analyzed retrospectively. Patients who developed DVT in the hospital were stratified according to the Wells clinical probability scoring system from criteria noted before the diagnosis. Treatment patterns and outcomes were evaluated between the two time intervals of 1992 to 2001 (group I) and 2002 to 2005 (group II).
RESULTS: Between 1992 and 2005, 358 children were evaluated for DVT, and 99 (52 boys, 47 girls) were admitted to the hospital and were determined to have DVT by confirmatory imaging. A prior DVT (12 total) was present in eight of the 21 patients admitted for DVT treatment; of the remaining, only seven received DVT prophylaxis on admission. In those developing a DVT, the inpatient clinical probability score was 21% (low), 40% (moderate), and 39% (high). The most common risk factor in those with prehospital DVT was a prior DVT (38%) or thrombophilic condition (33%), whereas inpatients had a central catheter (45%), with nearly 50% in the femoral vein. Children acquiring an inpatient DVT had concomitant severe respiratory (17%), oncologic (14%), and/or infectious (15%) diseases and required a prolonged intensive care unit (12.7 days) stay. Prehospital DVT was lower extremity predominant (90%) and statistically different from inpatient-acquired DVT (62%, P = .01). Treatment patterns between periods I and II revealed a trend to more low-molecular-weight heparin and less unfractionated heparin use (P = .09). Three patients died (one fatal pulmonary embolism). The number of recognized cases per 10,000 admissions increased from 0.3 to 28.8 from 1992 to 2005.
CONCLUSION: The incidence of DVT in hospitalized children is increasing. Those presenting with DVT typically have prior DVT, thrombophilia, or lower extremity disease. Our study suggests that children admitted with severe medical conditions who require a prolonged intensive care unit stay in addition to central venous access (especially via the femoral vein) should be considered candidates for DVT prophylaxis. A clinical probability scoring system alone cannot stratify patients sufficiently to forgo prophylaxis in hopes of a rapid clinical diagnosis. Childhood-specific level 1 trials aimed at determining guidelines for DVT prophylaxis are urgently required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18295440     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.11.054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  32 in total

Review 1.  Lower-extremity venous ultrasound - past, present and future.

Authors:  Rachelle Goldfisher
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-08-04

2.  Characterizing the Risk Factors Associated With Venous Thromboembolism in Pediatric Patients After Central Venous Line Placement.

Authors:  Sarah Wisecup; Shannan Eades; Yuliya Turiy
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct

3.  Survey results: characterization of direct thrombin inhibitor use in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Alexandra Oschman
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2014-01

4.  Endovascular thrombolysis to salvage central venous access in children with catheter-associated upper extremity deep vein thrombosis: technique and initial results.

Authors:  Matthew P Lungren; Thomas J Ward; Manish N Patel; John M Racadio; Kamlesh Kukreja
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  Symptomatic upper-extremity deep venous thrombosis after pacemaker placement in a pediatric patient: how to treat?

Authors:  David S Spar; Jeffrey B Anderson; Joseph S Palumbo; Kamlesh U Kukreja; Richard J Czosek
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 1.655

6.  Risk factors for in-hospital venous thromboembolism in children: a case-control study employing diagnostic validation.

Authors:  Brian R Branchford; Peter Mourani; Lalit Bajaj; Marilyn Manco-Johnson; Michael Wang; Neil A Goldenberg
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 9.941

7.  Survey of pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in critically ill children.

Authors:  Edward Vincent S Faustino; Sonya Patel; Ravi R Thiagarajan; Deborah J Cook; Veronika Northrup; Adrienne G Randolph
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolism in Pediatric Trauma Patients and Validation of a Novel Scoring System: The Risk of Clots in Kids With Trauma Score.

Authors:  Jennifer Yen; Kyle J Van Arendonk; Michael B Streiff; LeAnn McNamara; F Dylan Stewart; Kim G Conner; Richard E Thompson; Elliott R Haut; Clifford M Takemoto
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 3.624

9.  Lower extremity endovenous reconstruction for symptomatic occlusive disease in pediatric patients: techniques, clinical outcomes, and long-term stent patencies.

Authors:  Joseph L McDevitt; Ravi N Srinivasa; Anthony N Hage; Jacob J Bundy; Joseph J Gemmete; Jeffrey Forris Beecham Chick
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-03-09

10.  Trends in venous thromboembolism-related hospitalizations, 1994-2009.

Authors:  Sheree L Boulet; Scott D Grosse; Courtney D Thornburg; Hussain Yusuf; James Tsai; W Craig Hooper
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 7.124

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.