Literature DB >> 18295107

Surgical implications of early failed endovascular intervention of the superficial femoral artery.

Charles S Joels1, John W York, Corey A Kalbaugh, David L Cull, Eugene M Langan, Spence M Taylor.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is generally accepted that failed infrainguinal bypass with prosthetic material significantly compromises arterial run off, which may limit future revascularization. It is well known that the negative consequences of early vein graft thrombosis are limited, but the effect of failed peripheral angioplasty on the distal vasculature is poorly studied. The purpose of this study was to determine whether early failure after superficial femoral artery intervention influences subsequent revascularization options.
METHODS: Between July 1, 1998, and June 30, 2006, 276 patients underwent endovascular intervention of the superficial femoral artery. A prospective analysis of angiograms done before the intervention and after early failure (<or=200 days) was performed in a blinded fashion by three attending vascular surgeons to determine the optimal distal bypass site if an operation were to be performed. Inter-rater reliability of the angiogram scores was assessed using the Fleiss generalized kappa for multiple raters. Potential distal anastomotic sites were classified as above knee popliteal, below knee popliteal, tibial, or no adequate site. A consensus classification was determined for each patient (2 of 3 raters).
RESULTS: Of the 276 patients who underwent endovascular intervention of the superficial femoral artery, early failure was noted in 24 limbs in 23 patients. Angiographic records were available for 21 limbs in 20 patients (60% men; mean age, 65.3 +/- 11.3 years), of which 60% had critical limb ischemia, 40% had claudication, and 65% had diabetes. The distal bypass site was altered in six limbs (28.6%); four from popliteal to tibial and two from above knee to below knee popliteal. Inter-rater reliability was 0.54 (moderate/good). The procedures performed on these early failures were percutaneous transluminal angioplasty +/- stent (n = 14), infrainguinal bypass (n = 5), and no treatment (n = 1). Only 0.4% (1 of 276) of patients required major limb amputation due to early failure of a superficial femoral artery intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: Early failure after isolated endovascular intervention of the superficial femoral artery is infrequent and alters the distal target in 30% of early-failure patients if open bypass is planned. Salvage with repeat angioplasty, if necessary, can be accomplished in most patients, and the need for limb amputation is exceedingly rare. The early failure results in this study support a more liberal application of endovascular intervention to the superficial femoral artery in patients with lower extremity ischemia, especially claudication. The repercussions of late endovascular failure as well as the effects of disease progression need further study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18295107     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.11.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  10 in total

1.  Results for primary bypass versus primary angioplasty/stent for intermittent claudication due to superficial femoral artery occlusive disease.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Siracuse; Kristina A Giles; Frank B Pomposelli; Allen D Hamdan; Mark C Wyers; Elliot L Chaikof; April E Nedeau; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 2.  The role of infrainguinal bypass surgery in the endovascular era.

Authors:  Raffaele Pulli; Walter Dorigo; Azzurra Guidotti; Aaron Fargion; Alessandro Alessi Innocenti; Carlo Pratesi
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2014-02-04

3.  Results for primary bypass versus primary angioplasty/stent for lower extremity chronic limb-threatening ischemia.

Authors:  Jeremy D Darling; John C McCallum; Peter A Soden; Lindsey Korepta; Raul J Guzman; Mark C Wyers; Allen D Hamdan; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Prior failed ipsilateral percutaneous endovascular intervention in patients with critical limb ischemia predicts poor outcome after lower extremity bypass.

Authors:  Brian W Nolan; Randall R De Martino; David H Stone; Andres Schanzer; Philip P Goodney; Daniel W Walsh; Jack L Cronenwett
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 4.268

5.  Clinical results of single-vessel versus multiple-vessel infrapopliteal intervention.

Authors:  Jeremy D Darling; John C McCallum; Peter A Soden; John J Hon; Raul J Guzman; Mark C Wyers; Hence J Verhagen; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 4.268

6.  Peripheral arterial disease screening and diagnostic practice: A scoping review.

Authors:  Cornelius M Donohue; Joseph V Adler; Laura L Bolton
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-11-03       Impact factor: 3.315

7.  The current role of endovascular intervention in the management of diabetic peripheral arterial disease.

Authors:  Benjamin J Pearce; Boulos Toursarkissian
Journal:  Diabet Foot Ankle       Date:  2012-10-01

Review 8.  Optimal management of infrainguinal arterial occlusive disease.

Authors:  David J Pennywell; Tze-Woei Tan; Wayne W Zhang
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2014-10-24

9.  Network meta-analysis of drug-coated balloon angioplasty versus primary nitinol stenting for femoropopliteal atherosclerotic disease.

Authors:  Sherwin Abdoli; Melissa Mert; William M Lee; Christian J Ochoa; Steven G Katz
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 4.268

10.  Growing impact of restenosis on the surgical treatment of peripheral arterial disease.

Authors:  Douglas W Jones; Andres Schanzer; Yuanyuan Zhao; Todd A MacKenzie; Brian W Nolan; Michael S Conte; Philip P Goodney
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 5.501

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.