BACKGROUND:Direct pancreatic function tests (PFT) are conventionally performed with use of double-lumen "Dreiling" collection tubes. We have developed an endoscopic collection method (ePFT) that eases the performance of these tests. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to compare the bicarbonate results obtained from the secretin ePFT and Dreiling PFT methods in patients evaluated for chronic pancreatitis. DESIGN: A prospective crossover design was used to compare the PFT methods. SETTING: Tertiary care referral center. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS:Twenty-four patients undergoing an evaluation for chronic pancreatitis underwent the secretin-stimulated ePFT and Dreiling PFT methods on separate days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Duodenal fluid bicarbonate concentrations and estimated bicarbonate outputs were compared. RESULTS: The mean difference in peak bicarbonate concentration (Dreiling PFT minus ePFT) was 7 mEq/L (SD 20) and not statistically significant (P = .11). A good correlation in peak bicarbonate concentrations (r = 0.74, 95% CI, 0.48-0.88) and estimated bicarbonate output (r = 0.78, 95% CI, 0.54-0.90) was observed between the two PFT methods. LIMITATION: The sensitivities and specificities of the secretin ePFT and Dreiling PFT could not be compared because of the lack of a histologic gold standard. CONCLUSION: The secretin ePFT yields results similar to those of the Dreiling PFT in patients evaluated for chronic pancreatitis.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Direct pancreatic function tests (PFT) are conventionally performed with use of double-lumen "Dreiling" collection tubes. We have developed an endoscopic collection method (ePFT) that eases the performance of these tests. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to compare the bicarbonate results obtained from the secretin ePFT and Dreiling PFT methods in patients evaluated for chronic pancreatitis. DESIGN: A prospective crossover design was used to compare the PFT methods. SETTING: Tertiary care referral center. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Twenty-four patients undergoing an evaluation for chronic pancreatitis underwent the secretin-stimulated ePFT and Dreiling PFT methods on separate days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Duodenal fluid bicarbonate concentrations and estimated bicarbonate outputs were compared. RESULTS: The mean difference in peak bicarbonate concentration (Dreiling PFT minus ePFT) was 7 mEq/L (SD 20) and not statistically significant (P = .11). A good correlation in peak bicarbonate concentrations (r = 0.74, 95% CI, 0.48-0.88) and estimated bicarbonate output (r = 0.78, 95% CI, 0.54-0.90) was observed between the two PFT methods. LIMITATION: The sensitivities and specificities of the secretin ePFT and Dreiling PFT could not be compared because of the lack of a histologic gold standard. CONCLUSION: The secretin ePFT yields results similar to those of the Dreiling PFT in patients evaluated for chronic pancreatitis.
Authors: Amit S Grover; Alvin J Freeman; Maisam Abu-El-Haija; John F Eisses; Timothy B Gardner; Quin Y Liu; Mark E Lowe; Jaimie D Nathan; Tonya M Palermo; Vikesh K Singh; Andrew T Trout; Aliye Uc; Sohail Z Husain; Veronique D Morinville Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 2.839
Authors: Linda S Lee; Ying P Tabak; Vivek Kadiyala; Xiaowu Sun; Shadeah Suleiman; Richard S Johannes; Peter A Banks; Darwin L Conwell Journal: Pancreas Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 3.327
Authors: Kimberly A Kelly; Michael A Hollingsworth; Randall E Brand; Christina H Liu; Vikesh K Singh; Sudhir Srivastava; Ajay D Wasan; Dhiraj Yadav; Dana K Andersen Journal: Pancreas Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 3.327
Authors: Joao A Paulo; Linda S Lee; Bechien Wu; Peter A Banks; Hanno Steen; Darwin L Conwell Journal: Proteomics Clin Appl Date: 2011-03-01 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: J Enrique Domínguez-Muñoz; Jose Lariño-Noia; Ana Alvarez-Castro; Laura Nieto; Santiago Lojo; Saul Leal; Daniel de la Iglesia-Garcia; Julio Iglesias-Garcia Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2020-06-23 Impact factor: 4.623