Literature DB >> 18294318

Continuous activation of PpIX by daylight is as effective as and less painful than conventional photodynamic therapy for actinic keratoses; a randomized, controlled, single-blinded study.

S R Wiegell1, M Haedersdal, P A Philipsen, P Eriksen, C D Enk, H C Wulf.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a highly effective treatment for actinic keratoses (AK); however, it is time consuming and often painful for the patient. Daylight-PDT would make the treatment independent of the clinic and less painful due to the continuous activation of small amounts of porphyrins during its formation.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this randomized controlled study was to compare response rates and adverse effects after methyl aminolevulinate (MAL)-PDT using conventional red light-emitting diode (LED) light vs. daylight. PATIENTS/
METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with AK of the face and scalp were treated with MAL-PDT in two symmetrical areas. One area was illuminated by red LED light (37 J cm(-2)) after 3-h incubation with MAL under occlusive dressing. The other area was treated with daylight for 2.5 h after the MAL cream had been under occlusion for half an hour.
RESULTS: We found no significant difference in the treatment effect between the two treatments (P = 0.13), with a reduction of AK lesions of 79% in the daylight area compared with 71% in the LED area. Treatment response in the daylight area did not depend on the intensity of the daylight. Illumination with LED was more painful than daylight (P < 0.0001). Erythema and crusting occurred after both treatments and were similar in the two areas.
CONCLUSIONS: PDT of AK by continuous activation of porphyrins by daylight proved to be as effective as conventional PDT. PDT using daylight activation will make the treatment of these extremely common premalignant tumours more time and cost effective, and more convenient for the patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18294318     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08450.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Dermatol        ISSN: 0007-0963            Impact factor:   9.302


  32 in total

1.  Assessing daylight & low-dose rate photodynamic therapy efficacy, using biomarkers of photophysical, biochemical and biological damage metrics in situ.

Authors:  Ana Luiza Ribeiro de Souza; Ethan LaRochelle; Kayla Marra; Jason Gunn; Scott C Davis; Kimberley S Samkoe; M Shane Chapman; Edward V Maytin; Tayyaba Hasan; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther       Date:  2017-10-14       Impact factor: 3.631

2.  [Daylight photodynamic therapy : Back to the future?]

Authors:  P Lehmann
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 0.751

3.  Household light source for potent photo-dynamic antimicrobial effect and wound healing in an infective animal model.

Authors:  Azeem Ullah; Yuxiang Zhang; Zafar Iqbal; Yaxin Zhang; Dong Wang; Jincan Chen; Ping Hu; Zhuo Chen; Mingdong Huang
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 4.  Interventions for actinic keratoses.

Authors:  Aditya K Gupta; Maryse Paquet; Elmer Villanueva; William Brintnell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-12-12

5.  Comparison of Blue and White Lamp Light with Sunlight for Daylight-Mediated, 5-ALA Photodynamic Therapy, in vivo.

Authors:  Kayla Marra; Ethan P LaRochelle; M Shane Chapman; P Jack Hoopes; Karina Lukovits; Edward V Maytin; Tayyaba Hasan; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.421

6.  Daylight photodynamic therapy - Experience and safety in treatment of actinic keratoses of the face and scalp in low latitude and high brightness region.

Authors:  Luiz Eduardo Garcia Galvão; Heitor de Sá Gonçalves; Karine Paschoal Botelho; Juliana Chagas Caldas
Journal:  An Bras Dermatol       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.896

Review 7.  [New developments in photodynamic therapy].

Authors:  E Kohl; S Karrer
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 8.  Pain associated with aminolevulinic acid-photodynamic therapy of skin disease.

Authors:  Christine B Warren; Laszlo J Karai; Allison Vidimos; Edward V Maytin
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 11.527

Review 9.  [Actinic keratoses].

Authors:  T Hommel; R-M Szeimies
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 0.751

10.  Weather-informed Light-tissue Model-Based Dose Planning for Indoor Daylight Photodynamic Therapy.

Authors:  Ethan P M LaRochelle; Michael Shane Chapman; Edward V Maytin; Tayyaba Hasan; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 3.421

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.