Literature DB >> 18294212

Marine reserves: size and age do matter.

Joachim Claudet1, Craig W Osenberg, Lisandro Benedetti-Cecchi, Paolo Domenici, José-Antonio García-Charton, Angel Pérez-Ruzafa, Fabio Badalamenti, Just Bayle-Sempere, Alberto Brito, Fabio Bulleri, Jean-Michel Culioli, Mark Dimech, Jesús M Falcón, Ivan Guala, Marco Milazzo, Julio Sánchez-Meca, Paul J Somerfield, Ben Stobart, Frédéric Vandeperre, Carlos Valle, Serge Planes.   

Abstract

Marine reserves are widely used throughout the world to prevent overfishing and conserve biodiversity, but uncertainties remain about their optimal design. The effects of marine reserves are heterogeneous. Despite theoretical findings, empirical studies have previously found no effect of size on the effectiveness of marine reserves in protecting commercial fish stocks. Using 58 datasets from 19 European marine reserves, we show that reserve size and age do matter: Increasing the size of the no-take zone increases the density of commercial fishes within the reserve compared with outside; whereas the size of the buffer zone has the opposite effect. Moreover, positive effects of marine reserve on commercial fish species and species richness are linked to the time elapsed since the establishment of the protection scheme. The reserve size-dependency of the response to protection has strong implications for the spatial management of coastal areas because marine reserves are used for spatial zoning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18294212     DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01166.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  69 in total

1.  Communicating marine reserve science to diverse audiences.

Authors:  Kirsten Grorud-Colvert; Sarah E Lester; Satie Airamé; Elizabeth Neeley; Steven D Gaines
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Evolving science of marine reserves: new developments and emerging research frontiers.

Authors:  Steven D Gaines; Sarah E Lester; Kirsten Grorud-Colvert; Christopher Costello; Richard Pollnac
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Decadal-scale rebuilding of predator biomass in Philippine marine reserves.

Authors:  Garry R Russ; Angel C Alcala
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  The good, the bad and the ugly of marine reserves for fishery yields.

Authors:  Giulio A De Leo; Fiorenza Micheli
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Differential movement and movement bias models for marine protected areas.

Authors:  Jessica Langebrake; Louise Riotte-Lambert; Craig W Osenberg; Patrick De Leenheer
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 2.259

6.  Marine reserves as linked social-ecological systems.

Authors:  Richard Pollnac; Patrick Christie; Joshua E Cinner; Tracey Dalton; Tim M Daw; Graham E Forrester; Nicholas A J Graham; Timothy R McClanahan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Incorporating biogeography into evaluations of the Channel Islands marine reserve network.

Authors:  Scott L Hamilton; Jennifer E Caselle; Dan P Malone; Mark H Carr
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Designing marine reserve networks for both conservation and fisheries management.

Authors:  Steven D Gaines; Crow White; Mark H Carr; Stephen R Palumbi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  A global evaluation of coral reef management performance: are MPAs producing conservation and socio-economic improvements?

Authors:  Venetia Hargreaves-Allen; Susana Mourato; Eleanor Jane Milner-Gulland
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 3.266

10.  A global analysis of the effectiveness of marine protected areas in preventing coral loss.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Selig; John F Bruno
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.