Literature DB >> 18294039

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: fifty cases.

Sam B Bhayani1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) is a technically challenging procedure. The goal of this study is to describe the outcomes of 50 consecutive patients undergoing LPN performed by one surgeon.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Records were reviewed for clinical, pathologic, and follow-up information for patients undergoing LPN. Clinical parameters were assessed in both the first 25 and last 25 cases to see if there was a measurable learning curve.
RESULTS: Fifty-two patients underwent attempted LPN; 50 were successful and 2 were converted to open partial nephrectomy. Mean operating room time was 155 minutes, mean estimated blood loss was 172 mL, and mean pathologic size was 2.6 cm. Final pathology revealed malignancy in 60% of cases and oncocytoma in 22% of cases. Margins were clear for all of the primary lesions. Overall complications were 16%, with cardiopulmonary complications being the most common. There were no significant differences in the outcomes of the first 25 and the last 25 patients, with the exception of length of stay (3.1 days v 2.5 days).
CONCLUSIONS: After laparoendoscopic fellowship training in LPN, acceptable outcomes are achievable, and the learning curve is minimal. Long-term studies are needed on the efficacy of LPN, and further studies need to be performed to optimize the learning process for this technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18294039     DOI: 10.1089/end.2007.0128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  8 in total

1.  Association of Prevalence of Benign Pathologic Findings After Partial Nephrectomy With Preoperative Imaging Patterns in the United States From 2007 to 2014.

Authors:  Jae Heon Kim; Shufeng Li; Yash Khandwala; Kyung Jin Chung; Hyung Keun Park; Benjamin I Chung
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 2.  The role of minimally invasive surgery in multifocal renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Serge Ginzburg; Robert G Uzzo; Alexander Kutikov
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy after 60 cases: comparison with open partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  William B DeVoe; Kent W Kercher; William W Hope; Amy E Lincourt; H James Norton; Chris M Teigland
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy after fellowship training.

Authors:  Satyan K Shah; Surena F Matin; Eric A Singer; Louis Eichel; Hyung L Kim
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2009 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

5.  Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Technical considerations and an update.

Authors:  Jose L Dominguez-Escrig; Nikhil Vasdev; Anna O'Riordon; Naeem Soomro
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.407

6.  Combined robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Manish N Patel; Daniel Eun; Mani Menon; Craig G Rogers
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2009 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  Patient and nonradiographic tumor characteristics predicting lipid-poor angiomyolipoma in small renal masses: Introducing the BEARS index.

Authors:  Tyler M Bauman; Aaron M Potretzke; Alec J Wright; Joel M Vetter; Theodora A Potretzke; R Sherburne Figenshau
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2017-06-27

8.  A Single Surgeon's Experience with Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Partial Nephrectomy.

Authors:  Zachary Klaassen; Robert M Kohut; Dhruti Patel; Martha K Terris; Rabii Madi
Journal:  Int Sch Res Notices       Date:  2014-10-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.