Literature DB >> 18292756

Ambulatory blood pressure is a better marker than clinic blood pressure in predicting cardiovascular events in patients with/without type 2 diabetes.

Kazuo Eguchi1, Thomas G Pickering, Satoshi Hoshide, Joji Ishikawa, Shizukiyo Ishikawa, Joseph E Schwartz, Kazuyuki Shimada, Kazuomi Kario.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prognostic significance of ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) has not been established in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM).
METHODS: In order to clarify the impact of ABP on cardiovascular prognosis in patients with or without T2DM, we performed ABP monitoring (ABPM) in 1,268 subjects recruited from nine sites in Japan, who were being evaluated for hypertension. The mean age of the patients was 70.4 +/- 9.9 years, and 301 of them had diabetes. The patients were followed up for 50 +/- 23 months. We investigated the relation between incidence of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and different measures of ABP, including three categories of awake systolic blood pressure (SBP <135, 135-150, and >150 mm Hg), sleep SBP (<120, 120-135, and >135 mm Hg), and dipping trends in nocturnal blood pressure (BP) (dippers, nondippers, and risers). Cox regression models were used in order to control for classic risk factors.
RESULTS: Higher awake and sleep SBPs predicted higher incidence of CVD in patients with and without diabetes. In multivariable analyses, elevated SBPs while awake and asleep predicted increased risk of CVD more accurately than clinic BP did, in both groups of patients. The relationships between ABP level and CVD were similar in both groups. In Kaplan-Meier analyses, the incidence of CVD in nondippers was similar to that in dippers, but risers experienced the highest risk of CVD in both groups (P < 0.01). The riser pattern was associated with a approximately 150% increase in risk of CVD, in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that ABPM is a better predictor of cardiovascular risk than clinic BP, and that this holds true for patients with or without T2DM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18292756      PMCID: PMC3881175          DOI: 10.1038/ajh.2008.4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hypertens        ISSN: 0895-7061            Impact factor:   2.689


  45 in total

1.  Ambulatory blood-pressure monitoring in clinical practice.

Authors:  William B White
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-06-12       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Ambulatory blood pressure in type 2 diabetic patients with albuminuria: relation to the renal function and structural lesions.

Authors:  Ole Torffvit; Juan Tapia; Bengt Rippe; Per Alm; Julian Willner; Jan Tencer
Journal:  J Diabetes Complications       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.852

3.  Recommendations for the use of home (self) and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. American Society of Hypertension Ad Hoc Panel.

Authors:  T Pickering
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.689

4.  Albuminuria and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure in normoalbuminuric and microalbuminuric NIDDM patients. A longitudinal study.

Authors:  S Nielsen; A Schmitz; P L Poulsen; K W Hansen; C E Mogensen
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Clinical evaluation of 24 h ambulatory monitoring of blood pressure under various environmental conditions (home and work versus hospital).

Authors: 
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.444

6.  Pulse pressure and mortality in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients. A cohort study.

Authors:  Edoardo Mannucci; Lorella Lambertucci; Matteo Monami; Angela Fedeli; Veronica Chiasserini; Niccolò Marchionni; Giulio Masotti; Andrea Ungar
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.876

7.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: is it necessary for the routine assessment of hypertension in people with diabetes?

Authors:  M W J Strachan; K Gough; J A McKnight; P L Padfield
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.359

8.  Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure.

Authors:  Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 10.190

9.  Relationship between autonomic neuropathy, 24-h blood pressure profile, and nephropathy in normotensive IDDM patients.

Authors:  V Spallone; S Gambardella; M R Maiello; A Barini; S Frontoni; G Menzinger
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 10.  Task Force II: blood pressure measurement and cardiovascular outcome.

Authors:  J A Staessen; R Asmar; M De Buyzere; Y Imai; G Parati; K Shimada; G Stergiou; J Redón; P Verdecchia
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.444

View more
  58 in total

Review 1.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in spinal cord injury: clinical practicability.

Authors:  Michèle Hubli; Andrei V Krassioukov
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 2.  Chronotherapy for Hypertension.

Authors:  N P Bowles; S S Thosar; M X Herzig; S A Shea
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 3.  Chronotherapy improves blood pressure control and reduces vascular risk in CKD.

Authors:  Ramón C Hermida; Diana E Ayala; Michael H Smolensky; Artemio Mojón; José R Fernández; Juan J Crespo; Ana Moyá; María T Ríos; Francesco Portaluppi
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 28.314

4.  Visit-to-visit and ambulatory blood pressure variability as predictors of incident cardiovascular events in patients with hypertension.

Authors:  Kazuo Eguchi; Satoshi Hoshide; Joseph E Schwartz; Kazuyuki Shimada; Kazuomi Kario
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 2.689

5.  Effects of non-dipper blood pressure pattern on left ventricular rotational mechanics in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a speckle tracking study.

Authors:  Tayyar Gökdeniz; Ezgi Kalaycıoğlu; Ahmet Çağrı Aykan; İlker Gül; Faruk Boyacı; Mustafa Ozan Gürsoy
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 6.  Post-traumatic Stress Disorder and Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Matthew M Burg; Robert Soufer
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 7.  Chronotherapy with conventional blood pressure medications improves management of hypertension and reduces cardiovascular and stroke risks.

Authors:  Ramón C Hermida; Diana E Ayala; Michael H Smolensky; José R Fernández; Artemio Mojón; Francesco Portaluppi
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 3.872

8.  Effects of efforts to intensify management on blood pressure control among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension: a pilot study.

Authors:  Ramona S Dejesus; Rajeev Chaudhry; Dorinda J Leutink; Melanie A Hinton; Stephen S Cha; Robert J Stroebel
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2009-09-07

Review 9.  White-coat hypertension should not be treated in subjects with diabetes.

Authors:  Michael Bursztyn; Iddo Z Ben-Dov
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 10.  Should 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring be done in every patient with diabetes?

Authors:  Gianfranco Parati; Grzegorz Bilo
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 19.112

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.