Literature DB >> 18292180

The accuracy of multivariate models predicting ovarian reserve and pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis.

T E M Verhagen1, D J Hendriks, L F J M M Bancsi, B W J Mol, F J M Broekmans.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND To review the accuracy of multivariate models for the prediction of ovarian reserve and pregnancy in women undergoing IVF compared with the antral follicle count (AFC) as single test. METHODS We performed a computerized MEDLINE and EMBASE search to identify articles published on multivariate models for ovarian reserve testing in patients undergoing IVF. In order to be selected, articles had to contain data on the outcome of IVF in terms of either pregnancy and/or poor response and on the prediction of these events based on a multivariate model. For the selected studies, sensitivity and specificity of the test in the prediction of poor ovarian response and non-pregnancy were calculated. Overall performance was assessed by estimating a summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, which was compared with the ROC curve for the AFC as the current best single test. RESULTS We identified 11 studies reporting on the predictive capacity of multivariate models in ovarian reserve testing. All studies reported on the prediction of poor ovarian response, whereas none reported on the occurrence of pregnancy. The sensitivity for prediction of poor ovarian response varied between 39% and 97% and the specificity between 50% and 96%. Logistic regression analysis indicated that cohort studies provided a significantly better discriminative performance than case-control studies. As cohort studies are superior to case-control studies, further analysis was limited to the cohort studies. For the cohort studies, a summary ROC curve could be estimated, which had a shape similar to that previously made for the AFC. CONCLUSIONS The accuracy of multivariate models for the prediction of ovarian response in women undergoing IVF is similar to the accuracy of AFC. No data are available on the capacity of these models to predict pregnancy, let alone live birth. On the basis of these findings, the use of more than one single test for the assessment of ovarian reserve cannot currently be supported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18292180     DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmn001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod Update        ISSN: 1355-4786            Impact factor:   15.610


  18 in total

Review 1.  Ovarian reserve evaluation: state of the art.

Authors:  Bruno Ramalho de Carvalho; Ana Carolina Japur de Sá Rosa e Silva; Júlio César Rosa e Silva; Rosana Maria dos Reis; Rui Alberto Ferriani; Marcos Felipe Silva de Sá
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Basal serum testosterone levels correlate with ovarian response but do not predict pregnancy outcome in non-PCOS women undergoing IVF.

Authors:  Bo Sun; Fang Wang; Jing Sun; Wenzhu Yu; Yingpu Sun
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Defining ovarian reserve to better understand ovarian aging.

Authors:  Norbert Gleicher; Andrea Weghofer; David H Barad
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 5.211

4.  Prediction of different ovarian responses using anti-Müllerian hormone following a long agonist treatment protocol for IVF.

Authors:  Z Heidar; M Bakhtiyari; M Mirzamoradi; S Zadehmodarres; F S Sarfjoo; M A Mansournia
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2015-05-17       Impact factor: 4.256

5.  Basal serum level of Δ4-androstenedione reflects the ovaries' ability to respond to stimulation in IVF cycles: setting up a new reliable index of both ovarian reserve and response.

Authors:  Emanuele Garzia; Valentina Galiano; Laura Guarnaccia; Giovanni Marfia; Giulia Murru; Ellade Guermandi; Jennifer Riparini; Patrizia Sulpizio; Anna Maria Marconi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 3.357

6.  Effects of prolonging administration gonadotropin on unexpectedly poor ovarian responders undergoing in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Zhaolian Wei; Xianxia Cheng; Huirong Li; Yunxia Cao; Lin Cong; Ping Zhou; Jun Li
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 5.211

7.  Evaluation of ovarian reserve in infertile patients.

Authors:  Mehmet Fırat Mutlu; Ahmet Erdem
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2012-09-01

8.  Ovarian reserve assessment for infertility investigation.

Authors:  Bruno Ramalho de Carvalho; David Barreira Gomes Sobrinho; Andréa Duarte Damasceno Vieira; Manoela Porto Silva Resende; Antônio César Paes Barbosa; Adelino Amaral Silva; Hitomi Miura Nakagava
Journal:  ISRN Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-01-26

9.  ESR1 and ESR2 gene polymorphisms are associated with human reproduction outcomes in Brazilian women.

Authors:  Clarissa Santiago de Mattos; Camila Martins Trevisan; Carla Peluso; Fernando Adami; Emerson Barchi Cordts; Denise Maria Christofolini; Caio Parente Barbosa; Bianca Bianco
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 4.234

10.  Impact of GnRH ovarian stimulation protocols on intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes.

Authors:  Fátima Pinto; Cristiano Oliveira; Margarida F Cardoso; José Teixeira-da-Silva; Joaquina Silva; Mário Sousa; Alberto Barros
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 5.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.