Literature DB >> 18291436

Gender-selective effects of the P300 and N400 components of the visual evoked potential.

Scott C Steffensen1, Allison J Ohran, Daniel N Shipp, Kimberly Hales, Sarah H Stobbs, Donovan E Fleming.   

Abstract

There is an ongoing controversy regarding the role of gender in modulating components of the human visual-evoked potential (VEP) and event-related potentials (ERPs). Our aim was to further characterize the role of gender on VEPs, ERPs and response performance in an object recognition task. We recorded VEPs and reaction time (RT) in a paradigm wherein subjects responded to a randomly presented "Relevant" stimulus, and did not respond when presented with "Irrelevant" or "Standard" visual stimuli. There was no effect of gender on early components of the VEP or RT to Relevant stimuli. Relevant and Irrelevant stimuli evoked distinct VEP components including the P300, N400 and late-positive (LP) ERPs that were well-discriminated from those of the Standard stimulus. Females were characterized by greater P300 and N400 responses than males for the Relevant stimulus, but exclusively greater N400 responses for the Irrelevant stimulus. There were no significant gender differences for the LP, or for the latency of any ERP component. Gender differences were not attributed to hemispheric asymmetry, as there were no significant differences in P300 and N400 VEP amplitudes between lateral occipital or parietal electrode positions. These results indicate that the N400 can be elicited in a task requiring the processing of irrelevant, but not unexpected, stimuli and that females process visual information differently than males, perhaps by increased allocation of attentional resources to distracting stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18291436     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  13 in total

1.  Sex differences in equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: effects on N2 and P3.

Authors:  Sigita Melynyte; Osvaldas Ruksenas; Inga Griskova-Bulanova
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Gender difference in event related potentials to masked emotional stimuli in the oddball task.

Authors:  Eun Young Kim; Seung-Hwan Lee; Gewnhi Park; Sangrae Kim; Imyel Kim; Jeong-Ho Chae; Hyun Taek Kim
Journal:  Psychiatry Investig       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 2.505

3.  The Startle-Evoked Potential: Negative Affect and Severity of Pathology in Anxiety/Mood Disorders.

Authors:  Peter J Lang; David R Herring; Charlesynquette Duncan; Jan Richter; Christopher T Sege; Mathias Weymar; Anke Limberg-Thiesen; Alfons O Hamm; Margaret M Bradley
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2017-08-08

4.  Reduced influence of perceptual context in schizophrenia: behavioral and neurophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Victor J Pokorny; Timothy J Lano; Michael-Paul Schallmo; Cheryl A Olman; Scott R Sponheim
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 7.723

5.  Sex differences in early sensorimotor processing for speech discrimination.

Authors:  David Thornton; Ashley W Harkrider; David E Jenson; Tim Saltuklaroglu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The neural correlate of mid-value offers in ultimatum game.

Authors:  Xiyun Zhong; Ruojun Wang; Shiyun Huang; Jingwei Chen; Hongmin Chen; Chen Qu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The Effect of Reviewers' Self-Disclosure of Personal Review Record on Consumer Purchase Decisions: An ERPs Investigation.

Authors:  Jianhua Liu; Zan Mo; Huijian Fu; Wei Wei; Lijuan Song; Kewen Luo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-01-08

8.  Pain Processing in a Social Context and the Link with Psychopathic Personality Traits-An Event-Related Potential Study.

Authors:  Casper H van Heck; Josi M A Driessen; Maria Amato; Marnou N van den Berg; Pritha Bhandari; Laura Bilbao-Broch; Jordi Farres-Casals; Manon Hendriks; Adrian C Jodzio; Laura Luque-Ballesteros; Christina Schöchl; Laura R Velasco-Angeles; Roel H A Weijer; Clementina M van Rijn; Marijtje L A Jongsma
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  Sex Differences in Electrophysiology: P200 Event-related Potential Evidence.

Authors:  Ali K Bourisly; Ali Shuaib
Journal:  Transl Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 1.757

10.  Neural anomalies during vigilance in schizophrenia: Diagnostic specificity and genetic associations.

Authors:  Samuel D Klein; Laurie L Shekels; Kathryn A McGuire; Scott R Sponheim
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 4.881

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.