Literature DB >> 18291017

The value of an additional hypoechoic lesion-directed biopsy core for detecting prostate cancer.

Claartje Gosselaar1, Monique J Roobol, Stijn Roemeling, Tineke Wolters, Geert J L H van Leenders, Fritz H Schröder.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the value of a hypoechoic lesion (HL)-directed biopsy in addition to a systematic sextant biopsy for detecting prostate cancer. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Within the European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer, 37 627 assays for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) were done in men aged 55-75 years (screening round 1-3, interval 4 years). A PSA level of >or=3.0 ng/mL prompted a systematic transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided lateralized sextant biopsy (4986 biopsy sessions were evaluated). If there was a HL, an additional lesion-directed biopsy was taken.
RESULTS: At the initial screening, 1840 men were biopsied and 532 cancers were detected (28.9%). Of the men biopsied, 436 had a HL and an additional biopsy (23.7%). In these men, 230 cancers were detected (52.8%). In 3.5% (eight of 230) only the HL-directed core showed malignancy. At the repeat and third screening, respectively, 19.3% and 18.9% of the men biopsied had prostate cancer, 16.8% and 9.3% had an HL and the additional core detected two (2.2%) and one (5.9%) cancers. At the first screen most cancers found by the additional core were clinically relevant. In later screens these cancers seemed to be minimal.
CONCLUSION: The performance of TRUS as a screening tool is poor. The value of the additional core was limited as only 3.5% of the visible cancers were detected solely by the additional biopsy (round 1). However, a substantial part of these cancers were clinically relevant and would have been missed without the additional biopsy. This finding was less clear in screening round 2 and 3, even in men who were not previously biopsied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18291017     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07309.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  13 in total

1.  Detecting Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Marko Brock; Christian von Bodman; Jüri Palisaar; Wolfgang Becker; Philipp Martin-Seidel; Joachim Noldus
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Predictors for the detection of prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer using TRUS-guided biopsy in patients with negative initial biopsy results.

Authors:  Sangjun Yoo; Juhyun Park; Sung Yong Cho; Min Chul Cho; Ja Hyeon Ku; Hwancheol Son; Cheol Kwak; Hyeon Hoe Kim; Hyeon Jeong
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Quantitation of hypoechoic lesions for the prediction and Gleason grading of prostate cancer: a prospective study.

Authors:  Kwang Suk Lee; Kyo Chul Koo; Byung Ha Chung
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Should Hypoechoic Lesions on Transrectal Ultrasound Be Sampled During Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy?

Authors:  Nabeel A Shakir; M Minhaj Siddiqui; Arvin K George; Michael Kongnyuy; Richard Ho; Michele Fascelli; Maria J Merino; Baris Turkbey; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Applications of transrectal ultrasound in prostate cancer.

Authors:  C J Harvey; J Pilcher; J Richenberg; U Patel; F Frauscher
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Quantitative colour Doppler and greyscale ultrasound for evaluating prostate cancer.

Authors:  Khalid Ashi; Brooke Kirkham; Anil Chauhan; Susan M Schultz; Bonnie J Brake; Chandra M Sehgal
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2020-09-09

7.  Are hypoechoic lesions on transrectal ultrasonography a marker for clinically significant prostate cancer?

Authors:  Tae Il Noh; Yoon Sun Shin; Ji Sung Shim; Jong Hyun Yoon; Jae Heon Kim; Jae Hyun Bae; Du Geon Moon; Jae Young Park
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2013-10-15

Review 8.  Multiparametric MRI-targeted TRUS prostate biopsies using visual registration.

Authors:  Philippe Puech; Adil Ouzzane; Vianney Gaillard; Nacim Betrouni; Benoit Renard; Arnauld Villers; Laurent Lemaitre
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Association of multiparametric MRI quantitative imaging features with prostate cancer gene expression in MRI-targeted prostate biopsies.

Authors:  Radka Stoyanova; Alan Pollack; Mandeep Takhar; Charles Lynne; Nestor Parra; Lucia L C Lam; Mohammed Alshalalfa; Christine Buerki; Rosa Castillo; Merce Jorda; Hussam Al-Deen Ashab; Oleksandr N Kryvenko; Sanoj Punnen; Dipen J Parekh; Matthew C Abramowitz; Robert J Gillies; Elai Davicioni; Nicholas Erho; Adrian Ishkanian
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-08-16

10.  Prostate-specific antigen and prostate-specific antigen density cutoff points among Indonesian population suspected for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ahmad Anies Shahab; Doddy M Soebadi; Wahjoe Djatisoesanto; Sunaryo Hardjowijoto; Soetojo Soetojo; Lukman Hakim
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2013-01-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.