OBJECTIVE: Framing public health policy reform in ways that attract public and political support is a core skill of advocacy. In this paper we summarise the 12-year Australian history of advocacy for banning smoking in cars carrying children, culminating in the governments of the Australian States of South Australia and Tasmania enacting legislation. METHOD: 'Smoking in cars' was searched on the factiva.com print news media database, with returns limited to Australian newspapers published before 1 June 2007. RESULTS: The issue of smoking in cars received extensive and emotive media coverage, primarily in support of legislating a ban. Invoking the protection of vulnerable children in the debate about smoking in cars was a powerful and persuasive theme. Unlike all other advocacy for smoke-free areas, this debate was not contested by the tobacco industry or other commercial interest groups. CONCLUSIONS: Even in the absence of a co-ordinated advocacy campaign, public opinion studies on support for such legislation have been consistently strong. Communities view the protection of children as paramount and non-negotiable. IMPLICATIONS: Smoke-free cars legislation can and should be fast tracked in order to capitalise on this community support.
OBJECTIVE: Framing public health policy reform in ways that attract public and political support is a core skill of advocacy. In this paper we summarise the 12-year Australian history of advocacy for banning smoking in cars carrying children, culminating in the governments of the Australian States of South Australia and Tasmania enacting legislation. METHOD: 'Smoking in cars' was searched on the factiva.com print news media database, with returns limited to Australian newspapers published before 1 June 2007. RESULTS: The issue of smoking in cars received extensive and emotive media coverage, primarily in support of legislating a ban. Invoking the protection of vulnerable children in the debate about smoking in cars was a powerful and persuasive theme. Unlike all other advocacy for smoke-free areas, this debate was not contested by the tobacco industry or other commercial interest groups. CONCLUSIONS: Even in the absence of a co-ordinated advocacy campaign, public opinion studies on support for such legislation have been consistently strong. Communities view the protection of children as paramount and non-negotiable. IMPLICATIONS: Smoke-free cars legislation can and should be fast tracked in order to capitalise on this community support.
Authors: Ding Ding; Dennis R Wahlgren; Sandy Liles; Georg E Matt; McKenzie Oliver; Jennifer A Jones; Melbourne F Hovell Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Sara C Hitchman; Geoffrey T Fong; Mark P Zanna; Andrew Hyland; Maansi Bansal-Travers Journal: Eur J Public Health Date: 2010-07-14 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: Graham F Moore; Dorothy Currie; Gillian Gilmore; Jo C Holliday; Laurence Moore Journal: J Public Health (Oxf) Date: 2012-03-23 Impact factor: 2.341
Authors: Joan L Bottorff; Stephanie Barclay McKeown; Joanne Carey; Rebecca Haines; Chizimuzo Okoli; Kenneth C Johnson; Julie Easley; Roberta Ferrence; Lynne Baillie; Erin Ptolemy Journal: Health Educ Res Date: 2010-01-15
Authors: Emalie Rosewarne; Michael Moore; Wai-Kwan Chislett; Alexandra Jones; Kathy Trieu; Jacqui Webster Journal: Health Res Policy Syst Date: 2021-07-15