Literature DB >> 18289753

Could charcoal filtration of cigarette smoke reduce smoking-induced disease? A review of the literature.

Christopher R E Coggins1, Charles L Gaworski.   

Abstract

A review of the published work with charcoal-filtered cigarettes indicates that there are reductions in the concentrations for many gas-vapor phase constituents found in mainstream smoke. However, charcoal filters provided no apparent capacity for reduction of smoke particulate phase components. The reductions in gas-vapor phase smoke chemistry analytes generally correspond with findings of reduced toxicological activity, principally related to a reduction in the cytotoxic action of the volatile smoke constituents. Results of a short-term clinical study show small reductions in the biomarkers of the gas-vapor phase smoke constituents in subjects smoking charcoal-filtered cigarettes, compared to subjects smoking non-charcoal filtered cigarettes. The very limited epidemiology data (a single study) fail to demonstrate a conclusive beneficial effect of charcoal-filtered cigarette products compared to non-charcoal filtered cigarette products. Review of the scientific literature is hindered due to the lack of documentation regarding the activity of the charcoal used in the filter, and the inconsistency in product designs used between the various different disciplines (chemistry, pre-clinical, clinical and epidemiology) that have conducted studies with charcoal filtered cigarettes. There do not appear to be any published studies using a combination of data from the different disciplines based on a consistently designed charcoal cigarette filter. Although the literature presently available would suggest that smoke filtration provided by current charcoal filter techniques alone may not be substantial enough to reduce smoking-related disease, the data are limited. Therefore, for the reduction of smoking-induced disease, it is difficult to come to a definitive conclusion regarding the potential health benefits of using charcoal as a smoke filtration technology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18289753     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2008.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  7 in total

1.  Activated charcoal filter effectively reduces p-benzosemiquinone from the mainstream cigarette smoke and prevents emphysema.

Authors:  Neekkan Dey; Archita Das; Arunava Ghosh; Indu B Chatterjee
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Effect of Charcoal in Cigarette Filters on Free Radicals in Mainstream Smoke.

Authors:  Reema Goel; Zachary T Bitzer; Samantha M Reilly; Gurkirat Bhangu; Neil Trushin; Ryan J Elias; Jonathan Foulds; Joshua Muscat; John P Richie
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.739

3.  The use of charcoal in modified cigarette filters for mainstream smoke carbonyl reduction.

Authors:  Julie A Morabito; Matthew R Holman; Yan S Ding; Xizheng Yan; Michele Chan; Dana Chafin; Jose Perez; Magaly I Mendez; Roberto Bravo Cardenas; Clifford Watson
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 3.271

4.  gammaH2AX: A potential DNA damage response biomarker for assessing toxicological risk of tobacco products.

Authors:  Anthony P Albino; Ellen D Jorgensen; Patrick Rainey; Gene Gillman; T Jeffrey Clark; Diana Gietl; Hong Zhao; Frank Traganos; Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  Natural American Spirit launches 'Sky', the brand's first commercial organic cigarette with a charcoal filter.

Authors:  Jennifer Pearson; Daniel P Giovenco; M Jane Lewis; Meghan Moran; Ollie Ganz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 6.  Cigarette filter-based assays as proxies for toxicant exposure and smoking behavior--a literature review.

Authors:  John L Pauly; Richard J O'Connor; Geraldine M Paszkiewicz; K Michael Cummings; Mirjana V Djordjevic; Peter G Shields
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  A comparative assessment of cigarette smoke aerosols using an in vitro air-liquid interface cytotoxicity test.

Authors:  David Thorne; Annette Dalrymple; Deborah Dillon; Martin Duke; Clive Meredith
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.724

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.