Literature DB >> 18289611

Dynamic Bayesian sensitivity analysis of a myocardial metabolic model.

D Calvetti1, R Hageman, R Occhipinti, E Somersalo.   

Abstract

Dynamic compartmentalized metabolic models are identified by a large number of parameters, several of which are either non-physical or extremely difficult to measure. Typically, the available data and prior information is insufficient to fully identify the system. Since the models are used to predict the behavior of unobserved quantities, it is important to understand how sensitive the output of the system is to perturbations in the poorly identifiable parameters. Classically, it is the goal of sensitivity analysis to asses how much the output changes as a function of the parameters. In the case of dynamic models, the output is a function of time and therefore its sensitivity is a time dependent function. If the output is a differentiable function of the parameters, the sensitivity at one time instance can be computed from its partial derivatives with respect to the parameters. The time course of these partial derivatives describes how the sensitivity varies in time. When the model is not uniquely identifiable, or if the solution of the parameter identification problem is known only approximately, we may have not one, but a distribution of possible parameter values. This is always the case when the parameter identification problem is solved in a statistical framework. In that setting, the proper way to perform sensitivity analysis is to not rely on the values of the sensitivity functions corresponding to a single model, but to consider the distributed nature of the sensitivity functions, inherited from the distribution of the vector of the model parameters. In this paper we propose a methodology for analyzing the sensitivity of dynamic metabolic models which takes into account the variability of the sensitivity over time and across a sample. More specifically, we draw a representative sample from the posterior density of the vector of model parameters, viewed as a random variable. To interpret the output of this doubly varying sensitivity analysis, we propose visualization modalities particularly effective at displaying simultaneously variations over time and across a sample. We perform an analysis of the sensitivity of the concentrations of lactate and glycogen in cytosol, and of ATP, ADP, NAD(+) and NADH in cytosol and mitochondria, to the parameters identifying a three compartment model for myocardial metabolism during ischemia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18289611      PMCID: PMC2504529          DOI: 10.1016/j.mbs.2007.10.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Math Biosci        ISSN: 0025-5564            Impact factor:   2.144


  8 in total

1.  Use of sensitivity analysis to assess reliability of metabolic and physiological models.

Authors:  Michael C Kohn
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  Sensitivity analysis of stoichiometric networks: an extension of metabolic control analysis to non-steady state trajectories.

Authors:  Brian P Ingalls; Herbert M Sauro
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2003-05-07       Impact factor: 2.691

3.  Monte Carlo sampling can be used to determine the size and shape of the steady-state flux space.

Authors:  Sharon J Wiback; Iman Famili; Harvey J Greenberg; Bernhard Ø Palsson
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2004-06-21       Impact factor: 2.691

4.  Metabolic control analysis using transient metabolite concentrations. Determination of metabolite concentration control coefficients.

Authors:  J Delgado; J C Liao
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1992-08-01       Impact factor: 3.857

5.  Investigating the dynamic behavior of biochemical networks using model families.

Authors:  Marc Daniel Haunschild; Bernd Freisleben; Ralf Takors; Wolfgang Wiechert
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-12-16       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Mechanistic model of cardiac energy metabolism predicts localization of glycolysis to cytosolic subdomain during ischemia.

Authors:  Lufang Zhou; Jennifer E Salem; Gerald M Saidel; William C Stanley; Marco E Cabrera
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2005-01-28       Impact factor: 4.733

7.  Step and ramp induction of myocardial ischemia: comparison of in vivo and in silico results.

Authors:  J E Salem; M E Cabrera; M P Chandler; T A McElfresh; H Huang; J P Sterk; W C Stanley
Journal:  J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.011

8.  Uniform sampling of steady-state flux spaces: means to design experiments and to interpret enzymopathies.

Authors:  Nathan D Price; Jan Schellenberger; Bernhard O Palsson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.033

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  What can causal networks tell us about metabolic pathways?

Authors:  Rachael Hageman Blair; Daniel J Kliebenstein; Gary A Churchill
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.475

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.