Literature DB >> 18288694

Abiotic and biotic influences on the dispersal behavior of metamorph cane toads (Bufo marinus) in tropical Australia.

Travis Child1, Benjamin L Phillips, Richard Shine.   

Abstract

A mechanistic understanding of factors influencing the dispersal behavior of metamorph cane toads (Bufo marinus) has direct conservation relevance in Australia. These invasive anurans are toxic to native predators, and if we can predict their distribution across the landscape, we can also predict (and perhaps, manage) the scale of their impact. We propose that the major drivers of metamorph distribution are the risk of dehydration (restricting the young toads to moist substrates near pond margins) and biotic advantages to dispersal away from the pond (especially, less risk of cannibalism). To test this model, we investigated the influence of abiotic and biotic cues on the behavior of individual toads in the laboratory. Substrate moisture levels strongly influenced metamorph activity levels and habitat selection: dry substrates induced most metamorphs to remain near water. The only biotic cue to influence metamorph dispersal was proximity of a larger (cannibalistic) conspecific; a cannibal's presence at the pond margin caused most metamorphs to spend less time there, and as a consequence, to dehydrate more rapidly. Our results suggest that the spatial and temporal distribution of metamorph cane toads reflects a trade-off between competing risks: the danger of desiccation tends to keep young toads close to the pond margin in dry conditions, whereas the danger of cannibalism stimulates dispersal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18288694     DOI: 10.1002/jez.450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol        ISSN: 1932-5223


  9 in total

1.  Living up to its name? The effect of salinity on development, growth, and phenotype of the "marine" toad (Rhinella marina).

Authors:  Uditha Wijethunga; Matthew Greenlees; Richard Shine
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 2.200

2.  Embryonic exposure to conspecific chemicals suppresses cane toad growth and survival.

Authors:  Michael R Crossland; Richard Shine
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Excluding access to invasion hubs can contain the spread of an invasive vertebrate.

Authors:  Daniel Florance; Jonathan K Webb; Tim Dempster; Michael R Kearney; Alex Worthing; Mike Letnic
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Ontogenetic variation in the chemical defenses of cane toads (Bufo marinus): toxin profiles and effects on predators.

Authors:  R Andrew Hayes; Michael R Crossland; Mattias Hagman; Robert J Capon; Richard Shine
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Exploiting intraspecific competitive mechanisms to control invasive cane toads (Rhinella marina).

Authors:  Michael R Crossland; Takashi Haramura; Angela A Salim; Robert J Capon; Richard Shine
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Larger body size at metamorphosis enhances survival, growth and performance of young cane toads (Rhinella marina).

Authors:  Elisa Cabrera-Guzmán; Michael R Crossland; Gregory P Brown; Richard Shine
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The interacting effects of ungulate hoofprints and predatory native ants on metamorph cane toads in tropical Australia.

Authors:  Elisa Cabrera-Guzmán; Michael R Crossland; Edna González-Bernal; Richard Shine
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Moving south: effects of water temperatures on the larval development of invasive cane toads (Rhinella marina) in cool-temperate Australia.

Authors:  Uditha Wijethunga; Matthew Greenlees; Richard Shine
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Evaluating dispersal potential of an invasive fish by the use of aerobic scope and osmoregulation capacity.

Authors:  Jane W Behrens; Mikael van Deurs; Emil A F Christensen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.