Literature DB >> 1828799

Development of in-vitro resistance to glycopeptide antibiotics: assessment in staphylococci of different species.

F Biavasco1, E Giovanetti, M P Montanari, R Lupidi, P E Varaldo.   

Abstract

Forty-two clinical isolates belonging to ten species of staphylococci were studied for their ability to develop single-step resistance, in vitro, to glycopeptide antibiotics. Selection was attempted through separate exposure to four glycopeptides (vancomycin, teicoplanin, and two investigational semisynthetic derivatives of the latter, TD-A3 and CTA-A1) on agar containing 10 mg/l of the test drug. No survivors from any test strain were recovered after exposure to TD-A3 or CTA-A1. After exposure to vancomycin or teicoplanin, surviving clones were only recovered from strains of three species, Staphylococcus aureus, S. epidermidis, and S. haemolyticus. Emergence of resistant clones was easier to observe from strains of S. haemolyticus exposed to teicoplanin. When tested for susceptibility, many survivors exhibited vancomycin and teicoplanin MICs below the drug concentration used for in-vitro selection, probably due to an inoculum effect in the plating procedure. In particular, the vancomycin MICs did not exceed 8 mg/l for S. aureus and S. epidermidis clones, and reached 16 mg/l for some clones from a S. haemolyticus strain. Teicoplanin MICs did not exceed 8 mg/l for S. aureus clones, but reached 64 mg/l for some clones of S. epidermidis, and were particularly high (64 to greater than or equal to 128 mg/l) for most clones of S. haemolyticus. In contrast, against all clones selected from all three species, the MICs of TD-A3 and CTA-A1 did not exceed 2 and 4 mg/l, respectively. Morphological investigations indicated that the colonies of a highly resistant S. haemolyticus clone were smaller and more butyraceous in consistency than those of the parent strain. In transmission and scanning electron microscopy studies, this same S. haemolyticus clone showed a more irregular cell wall than the parent strain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1828799     DOI: 10.1093/jac/27.1.71

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  23 in total

1.  Relationship between glycopeptide use and decreased susceptibility to teicoplanin in isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci.

Authors:  M Bertin; A Muller; X Bertrand; C Cornette; M Thouverez; D Talon
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  In vitro activities of three semisynthetic amide derivatives of teicoplanin, MDL 62208, MDL 62211, and MDL 62873.

Authors:  F Biavasco; R Lupidi; P E Varaldo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Characterization of passage-selected vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains of diverse parental backgrounds.

Authors:  R F Pfeltz; V K Singh; J L Schmidt; M A Batten; C S Baranyk; M J Nadakavukaren; R K Jayaswal; B J Wilkinson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Current perspectives on glycopeptide resistance.

Authors:  N Woodford; A P Johnson; D Morrison; D C Speller
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Decreased susceptibilities to teicoplanin and vancomycin among coagulase-negative methicillin-resistant clinical isolates of staphylococci.

Authors:  K Sieradzki; P Villari; A Tomasz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Emerging resistance to antimicrobial agents in gram-positive bacteria. Enterococci, staphylococci and nonpneumococcal streptococci.

Authors:  M G Cormican; R N Jones
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Activities of trovafloxacin and ampicillin-sulbactam alone or in combination versus three strains of vancomycin- intermediate Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro pharmacodynamic infection model.

Authors:  J R Aeschlimann; E Hershberger; M J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Antimicrobial susceptibility of coagulase-negative staphylococci.

Authors:  G L Archer; M W Climo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  In vitro development and stability of tolerance to cloxacillin and vancomycin in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  G P Voorn; J Thompson; W H Goessens; W C Schmal-Bauer; P H Broeders; M F Michel
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  In vitro conjugative transfer of VanA vancomycin resistance between Enterococci and Listeriae of different species.

Authors:  F Biavasco; E Giovanetti; A Miele; C Vignaroli; B Facinelli; P E Varaldo
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.