Literature DB >> 18287495

Inhibitory gating of vibrissal inputs in the brainstem.

Takahiro Furuta1, Elena Timofeeva, Kouichi Nakamura, Keiko Okamoto-Furuta, Masaya Togo, Takeshi Kaneko, Martin Deschênes.   

Abstract

Trigeminal sensory nuclei are the first processing stage in the vibrissal system of rodents. They feature separate populations of thalamic projecting cells and a rich network of intersubnuclear connections, so that what is conveyed to the cortex by each of the ascending pathways of vibrissal information depends on local transactions that occur in the brainstem. In the present study, we examined the nature of these intersubnuclear connections by combining electrolytic lesions with electrophysiological recordings, retrograde labeling with in situ hybridization, and anterograde labeling with immunoelectron microscopy. Together, these different approaches provide conclusive evidence that the principal trigeminal nucleus receives inhibitory GABAergic projections from the caudal sector of the interpolaris subnucleus, and excitatory glutamatergic projections from the caudalis subnucleus. These results raise the possibility that, by controlling the activity of intersubnuclear projecting cells, brain regions that project to the spinal trigeminal nuclei may take an active part in selecting the type of vibrissal information that is conveyed through the lemniscal pathway.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18287495      PMCID: PMC6671442          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4627-07.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  28 in total

Review 1.  Neuronal basis for object location in the vibrissa scanning sensorimotor system.

Authors:  David Kleinfeld; Martin Deschênes
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  On-going computation of whisking phase by mechanoreceptors.

Authors:  Avner Wallach; Knarik Bagdasarian; Ehud Ahissar
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Influence of subcortical inhibition on barrel cortex receptive fields.

Authors:  Akio Hirata; Juan Aguilar; Manuel A Castro-Alamancos
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Opposite adaptive processing of stimulus intensity in two major nuclei of the somatosensory brainstem.

Authors:  Boaz Mohar; Yonatan Katz; Ilan Lampl
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Feedforward inhibition determines the angular tuning of vibrissal responses in the principal trigeminal nucleus.

Authors:  Marie-Andrée Bellavance; Maxime Demers; Martin Deschênes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Parallel Inhibitory and Excitatory Trigemino-Facial Feedback Circuitry for Reflexive Vibrissa Movement.

Authors:  Marie-Andrée Bellavance; Jun Takatoh; Jinghao Lu; Maxime Demers; David Kleinfeld; Fan Wang; Martin Deschênes
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Motor cortex broadly engages excitatory and inhibitory neurons in somatosensory barrel cortex.

Authors:  Amanda K Kinnischtzke; Daniel J Simons; Erika E Fanselow
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-03-31       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 8.  Bidirectional learning in upbound and downbound microzones of the cerebellum.

Authors:  Chris I De Zeeuw
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 34.870

9.  The transcription factor, Lmx1b, promotes a neuronal glutamate phenotype and suppresses a GABA one in the embryonic trigeminal brainstem complex.

Authors:  Chuan-Xi Xiang; Kai-Hua Zhang; Randy L Johnson; Mark F Jacquin; Zhou-Feng Chen
Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 1.111

10.  Coding of apparent motion in the thalamic nucleus of the rat vibrissal somatosensory system.

Authors:  Valérie Ego-Stengel; Julie Le Cam; Daniel E Shulz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.