Literature DB >> 18287264

Canine anatomic phantom for preclinical dosimetry in internal emitter therapy.

Laura Padilla1, Choonsik Lee, Rowan Milner, Amir Shahlaee, Wesley E Bolch.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The majority of investigational studies of new diagnostic and therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals use murine animal models for preclinical assessments of pharmacokinetics and organ radiation dosimetry. Although mice and rats are widely available and relatively inexpensive, their smaller organ anatomy relative to that of humans can lead to considerable differences in organ dosimetry, thus complicating extrapolations of dose-response relationships to human patients. Nonhuman primates circumvent these problems in many respects but are increasingly becoming expensive and limited because of ethical considerations. With the recent completion of the dog genome project and the recognition of many similarities between canine and human cancers, dogs are increasingly being considered in cancer research and drug development. The main objective of this study was to construct a 3-dimensional computational phantom of a large dog on the basis of whole-body multislice CT data.
METHODS: A female hound cross underwent whole-body contrast-enhanced CT at a 2-mm slice thickness. On completion of the scan, the dog was euthanized, and the entire skeleton was harvested for a subsequent microCT investigation. The CT data were imported into a computational software program and used to create a polygon-mesh phantom of the entire animal. All of the major organs and bones were semiautomatically segmented and tagged to the CT slices. The phantom data were imported into a second software program and transformed to a nonuniform rational basis-spline surface phantom, allowing easy alteration of the phantom to simulate dogs of smaller or larger statures. A voxel-based version of the canine phantom was created by use of an in-house routine for subsequent import into the EGSnrc radiation transport code for photon and beta-particle organ dosimetry.
RESULTS: The resulting voxel-based version of the canine phantom had a total body mass of 26.0 kg and a total body tissue mass (exclusive of wall organ content) of 24.5 kg. Although this University of Florida (UF) canine phantom displayed a total body mass intermediate between those of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) 5-y and 10-y stylized human phantoms of the MIRDOSE and OLINDA software codes, considerable differences were noted in organ photon cross-doses. For example, ratios of the specific absorbed fraction Phi(lungs <-- liver)(UF Dog) to Phi(lungs <-- liver)(ORNL 5-y) ranged from approximately 30 at 10 keV to approximately 3.5 at 1 MeV. Corresponding ratios of Phi(lungs <-- liver)(UF Dog) to Phi(lungs <-- liver)(ORNL 10-y) ranged from approximately 6 at 10 keV to approximately 1.3 at 1 MeV. Conversely, values of Phi(kidneys <-- spleen) and Phi(liver <-- spleen) were noted to be much lower (factors of 2-4) and much higher (factors of 2-15), respectively, in the canine phantom than in the ORNL human phantoms. These differences were attributed more to organ shape and position within the torso than to organ mass, because many of the canine organs closely approximated their counterparts volumetrically in the stylized pediatric human phantoms.
CONCLUSION: The use of canine models, particularly in spontaneously occurring malignancies such as osteosarcoma, for preclinical testing of antineoplastic agents offers significant advantages over current murine models. However, the development of canine-specific technology is critical to the optimization of these studies. The UF canine dosimetry phantom described here aims to solve problems that could stem from the use of current human dosimetry models during radiopharmaceutical research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18287264     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.107.046722

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  5 in total

1.  Conversion of computational human phantoms into DICOM-RT for normal tissue dose assessment in radiotherapy patients.

Authors:  Keith T Griffin; Matthew M Mille; Christopher Pelletier; Mahesh Gopalakrishnan; Jae Won Jung; Choonik Lee; John Kalapurakal; Anil Pyakuryal; Choonsik Lee
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  In-vivo biodistribution and safety of 99mTc-LLP2A-HYNIC in canine non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Allison L Zwingenberger; Michael S Kent; Ruiwu Liu; David L Kukis; Erik R Wisner; Sally J DeNardo; Sandra L Taylor; Xiucui Chen; Kit S Lam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Determination of topographical radiation dose profiles using gel nanosensors.

Authors:  Karthik Pushpavanam; Sahil Inamdar; Subhadeep Dutta; Tomasz Bista; Thaddeus Sokolowski; Eric Boshoven; Stephen Sapareto; Kaushal Rege
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 14.136

4.  Radiation Safety Considerations in the Treatment of Canine Skeletal Conditions Using 153Sm, 90Y, and 117mSn.

Authors:  Richard E Wendt; Kimberly A Selting; Jimmy C Lattimer; Janine Wong; Jaime Simón; Nigel R Stevenson; Stanley D Stearns
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 2.922

5.  Development of a minipig physical phantom from CT data.

Authors:  Sooyeun Park; Pilsoo Lee; Wi-Ho Ha; Han Sung Kim; Byeong Ryong Park; Jae Seok Kim; Sehwan Shim; Sunhoo Park; Young-Su Kim; Chan Hyeong Kim; Young-Woo Jin
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.724

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.