Robert F Reilly1. 1. Division of Nephrology, Veterans Affairs North Texas Health Care System and University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas 75216, USA. robert.reilly2@va.gov
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Recent studies strongly link nephrogenic systemic fibrosis to gadolinium administration for magnetic resonance imaging. In a recent advisory, the Food and Drug Administration stated that all gadolinium-containing chelates are potentially associated with nephrogenic systemic fibrosis; however, most reported cases are linked to gadodiamide (Omniscan) and gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist). Given the severe consequences of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis, it is critical to define the risks associated with each gadolinium-containing chelate. The purpose of this study was to examine nephrogenic systemic fibrosis risk in a hemodialysis population exposed to gadoteridol (ProHance). DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & OBJECTIVES: Appointment logs were used to generate a database of all long-term hemodialysis patients at the Dallas Veterans Affairs hospital since August 2001. These patients were then examined in the Veterans Affair's electronic medical record system for gadolinium exposure during magnetic resonance imaging from 2000 through 2007, a period during which gadoteridol was the sole contrast agent used. RESULTS: A total of 141 patients were identified with 198 gadoteridol exposures. No cases of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis were identified. The observed frequency of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis was compared with the expected frequency (2.4%) using one-way chi(2) and binomial analysis, yielding a P < 0.05, indicating that the result was not explained by chance alone. CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that the risk for nephrogenic systemic fibrosis with gadoteridol in patients who are on long-term hemodialysis may be lower than with gadodiamide and gadopentetate dimeglumine.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Recent studies strongly link nephrogenic systemic fibrosis to gadolinium administration for magnetic resonance imaging. In a recent advisory, the Food and Drug Administration stated that all gadolinium-containing chelates are potentially associated with nephrogenic systemic fibrosis; however, most reported cases are linked to gadodiamide (Omniscan) and gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist). Given the severe consequences of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis, it is critical to define the risks associated with each gadolinium-containing chelate. The purpose of this study was to examine nephrogenic systemic fibrosis risk in a hemodialysis population exposed to gadoteridol (ProHance). DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & OBJECTIVES: Appointment logs were used to generate a database of all long-term hemodialysis patients at the Dallas Veterans Affairs hospital since August 2001. These patients were then examined in the Veterans Affair's electronic medical record system for gadolinium exposure during magnetic resonance imaging from 2000 through 2007, a period during which gadoteridol was the sole contrast agent used. RESULTS: A total of 141 patients were identified with 198 gadoteridol exposures. No cases of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis were identified. The observed frequency of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis was compared with the expected frequency (2.4%) using one-way chi(2) and binomial analysis, yielding a P < 0.05, indicating that the result was not explained by chance alone. CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that the risk for nephrogenic systemic fibrosis with gadoteridol in patients who are on long-term hemodialysis may be lower than with gadodiamide and gadopentetate dimeglumine.
Authors: Dale R Broome; Mark S Girguis; Pedro W Baron; Alfred C Cottrell; Ingrid Kjellin; Gerald A Kirk Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Peter Marckmann; Lone Skov; Kristian Rossen; Anders Dupont; Mette Brimnes Damholt; James Goya Heaf; Henrik S Thomsen Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2006-08-02 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Elizabeth A Sadowski; Lindsey K Bennett; Micah R Chan; Andrew L Wentland; Andrea L Garrett; Robert W Garrett; Arjang Djamali Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-01-31 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Khaled Abdel-Kader; Priti R Patel; Alexander J Kallen; Ronda L Sinkowitz-Cochran; Warren K Bolton; Mark L Unruh Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2010-03-18 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Luis M De León-Rodríguez; André F Martins; Marco C Pinho; Neil M Rofsky; A Dean Sherry Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2015-05-14 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Joseph Lunyera; Dinushika Mohottige; Anastasia-Stefania Alexopoulos; Hilary Campbell; C Blake Cameron; Nicole Sagalla; Timothy J Amrhein; Matthew J Crowley; Jessica R Dietch; Adelaide M Gordon; Andrzej S Kosinski; Sarah Cantrell; John W Williams; Jennifer M Gierisch; Belinda Ear; Karen M Goldstein Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2020-06-23 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Brena F Sena; Julia P Stern; Pari V Pandharipande; Barbara Klemm; Julie Bulman; Ivan Pedrosa; Neil M Rofsky Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 3.959