BACKGROUND: Circulating endothelial cells (CECs) have emerged as non-invasive biomarkers of vascular dysfunction. The most widely used method for their detection is CD146-based immunomagnetic separation (IMS). Although this approach has provided consensus values in both normal and pathologic situations, it remains tedious and requires a trained operator. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to evaluate a new hybrid assay for CEC measurement using a combination of pre-enrichment of CD146+ circulating cells and multiparametric flow cytometry measurement (FCM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: CECs were determined in peripheral blood from 20 healthy volunteers, 12 patients undergoing coronary angioplasty, and 30 renal transplant recipients, and blood spiked with cultured endothelial cells. CD146+ cells were isolated using CD146-coated magnetic nanoparticles and labeled using CD45-fluorescein isothiocyanate and CD146-PE or isotype control antibody and propidium iodide before FCM. The same samples were also processed using CD146-based immunomagnetic separation as the reference method. RESULTS: The hybrid assay detected CECs, identified as CD45(dim)/CD146(bright)/propidium iodide(+), with high size-related scatter characteristics, and clearly discriminated these from CD45(bright)/CD146(dim) activated T lymphocytes. The method demonstrated both high recovery efficiency and good reproducibility. Both IMS and the hybrid assay similarly identified increased CEC levels in patients undergoing coronary angioplasty and renal transplantation, when compared to healthy controls. In patients, CEC values from these two methods were of the same order of magnitude and highly correlated. Bland-Altman analysis revealed poor statistical agreement between methods, flerrofluid-FCM providing higher values than IMS. CONCLUSION: This new hybrid FCM assay constitutes an accurate alternative to visual counting of CECs following CD146-based IMS.
BACKGROUND: Circulating endothelial cells (CECs) have emerged as non-invasive biomarkers of vascular dysfunction. The most widely used method for their detection is CD146-based immunomagnetic separation (IMS). Although this approach has provided consensus values in both normal and pathologic situations, it remains tedious and requires a trained operator. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to evaluate a new hybrid assay for CEC measurement using a combination of pre-enrichment of CD146+ circulating cells and multiparametric flow cytometry measurement (FCM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: CECs were determined in peripheral blood from 20 healthy volunteers, 12 patients undergoing coronary angioplasty, and 30 renal transplant recipients, and blood spiked with cultured endothelial cells. CD146+ cells were isolated using CD146-coated magnetic nanoparticles and labeled using CD45-fluorescein isothiocyanate and CD146-PE or isotype control antibody and propidium iodide before FCM. The same samples were also processed using CD146-based immunomagnetic separation as the reference method. RESULTS: The hybrid assay detected CECs, identified as CD45(dim)/CD146(bright)/propidium iodide(+), with high size-related scatter characteristics, and clearly discriminated these from CD45(bright)/CD146(dim) activated T lymphocytes. The method demonstrated both high recovery efficiency and good reproducibility. Both IMS and the hybrid assay similarly identified increased CEC levels in patients undergoing coronary angioplasty and renal transplantation, when compared to healthy controls. In patients, CEC values from these two methods were of the same order of magnitude and highly correlated. Bland-Altman analysis revealed poor statistical agreement between methods, flerrofluid-FCM providing higher values than IMS. CONCLUSION: This new hybrid FCM assay constitutes an accurate alternative to visual counting of CECs following CD146-based IMS.
Authors: Julie A Mund; Myka L Estes; Mervin C Yoder; David A Ingram; Jamie Case Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2012-01-26 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Saurabh Sethi; Douglas A Simonetto; Soha S Abdelmoneim; Michael B Campion; Irakli Kaloiani; Amy C Clayton; Walter K Kremers; Kevin C Halling; Patrick S Kamath; Jayant Talwalkar; Vijay H Shah Journal: J Clin Exp Hepatol Date: 2012-04-12
Authors: Myka L Estes; Julie A Mund; Laura E Mead; Daniel N Prater; Shanbao Cai; Haiyan Wang; Karen E Pollok; Michael P Murphy; Caroline S T An; Edward F Srour; David A Ingram; Jamie Case Journal: Cytometry A Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 4.355
Authors: Soha S Abdelmoneim; Jayant Talwalkar; Saurabh Sethi; Patrick Kamath; Mohamed Mahmoud Fahmy Fathalla; Benjamin R Kipp; Michael B Campion; Amy C Clayton; Kevin C Halling; Vijay H Shah Journal: Liver Int Date: 2009-10-19 Impact factor: 5.828
Authors: Brian M Rapp; M Reza Saadatzedeh; Richard H Ofstein; Janak R Bhavsar; Zachary S Tempel; Oscar Moreno; Peter Morone; Dana A Booth; Dmitry O Traktuev; Michael C Dalsing; David A Ingram; Mervin C Yoder; Keith L March; Michael P Murphy Journal: Cell Med Date: 2011-12-09
Authors: Marilyne Levy; Damien Bonnet; Laetitia Mauge; David S Celermajer; Pascale Gaussem; David M Smadja Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-06-10 Impact factor: 3.240